Breathing is essential for survival, but in some places the air quality poses significant health risks. Exposure to air pollution is linked to lung cancer, asthma attacks, cardiovascular damage, reproductive harm, and more.
Chemical Exposure
Pollutants that originate outside get a lot of attention from regulators, and for good reason. In a study published in 2013, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology tracked emissions throughout the United States and found that air pollution from vehicles, industry, and other sources causes about 200,000 early deaths each year. Vehicle emissions alone were responsible for 53,000 premature deaths—about 15,000 more than were caused by car accidents.However, research demonstrates that chemicals that originate indoors may be just as harmful. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in some cases, concentrations of indoor pollutants have been shown to be twice as high as those outside. This is particularly concerning because we spend the vast majority of our time—around 90 percent—indoors.
Some indoor pollutants, such as radon gas, naturally emanate from the earth and seep into buildings through cracks in the foundation. Mold and legacy toxins such as lead and asbestos are hazards that must also be dealt with in order to protect our precious breathing space.
However, the majority of indoor toxins come from sources we voluntarily bring into our environment.
There are about 82,000 chemicals in commercial use, and no available health data for 85 percent of them. In the last few years, researchers have learned a lot about the risks associated with exposure to many indoor air pollutants, but the vast majority remains a mystery.
Protecting Your Space
Harvard’s For Health website provides science-backed guidelines on how to create a healthy indoor environment. When choosing products that will share your breathing space, there are three chemical families of particular concern:Other common indoor pollutants found to pose risks to human health include nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as formaldehyde, limonene, and benzene. These pollutants may come from printer emissions, cleaning supplies, personal care products, paint, pesticides, and more.
“We need to make better decisions about the products we put into our homes—low VOCs, no pesticide use, and purchasing furniture without flame retardant chemicals,” said Allen, who is also the director of the Healthy Buildings Program at Harvard, where he investigates the connections between indoor air quality and health.
Ventilation
Making matters worse, our homes, schools, and offices are often built in such a way that toxic chemicals get trapped inside, concentrating in our air space. A lack of ventilation is one of the biggest reasons indoor air quality is so poor, and modern building methods are to blame, Allen says.Airflow was always an important consideration for previous generations of architects. But starting in the 1970s, builders began creating spaces that were more tightly sealed. Since 2000, there has been an even greater effort to ensure that our buildings remain air tight.
With minimal ventilation, air can’t circulate. Pollution concentrates indoors, and, by design, there’s little exchange of fresh air brought from outside. As a result, people who reside in “sick buildings” may develop eye irritation, headaches, breathing problems, and other health issues.
Virtually every building we inhabit—from the coffee shop you visited this morning to the place you’re reading this article right now—is governed by this minimal ventilation standard.
Several studies have shown that people who live, work, or attend school in buildings with good air circulation are healthier and more productive than those who inhabit poorly ventilated spaces. One study conducted in California found that students felt calmer and had longer attention spans in highly ventilated classrooms.
Studies have also demonstrated a relationship between poor ventilation rates and higher instances of short-term sick leave, asthma, and respiratory infection among building occupants.
In the interest of keeping energy costs down, most builders still tend toward minimal ventilation. But Allen says we spend too much time indoors to live and work in spaces that sacrifice our health.
More Ways to Improve Air Quality
We can’t see or smell many of the chemicals that pervade our environment. Besides chemically sensitive individuals, most of us don’t think about our indoor air space until someone gets sick. Even then, we may still not link our health problems to air quality.But we can take simple precautions to ensure that our inside air is as clean as can be.
In addition to improving ventilation and limiting exposure to toxic off-gassing chemicals, be sure to employ simple public health measures. “Wash your hands, and take your shoes off so you’re not tracking in outdoor pollutants into your home,” Allen said.
Another step is controlling exposure to fine particles in your environment. One way in which we create these particles is cooking. That’s why Allen recommends installing an exhaust system over your stove.
“You want exhaust ventilation that is capturing those pollutants and putting them outside,” he said. “A lot of the time, they’re just putting them right back into your breathing zone.
To collect these fine particles while cleaning, use a vacuum with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration. “Very often when people use a vacuum, it doesn’t capture the particles, it just disperses the particles and turns them into smaller particles. So you can actually increase the exposure,” Allen said.
The good news is, making these small improvements can have a big impact. Last year, Allen and his team published a study that examined how the indoor environment impacts our ability to think and process information. Researchers had people come into a controlled environment, and each day made various changes to the air the participants’ breathed, then tested their cognitive functions.
“Even with minor improvements in the environment, we saw better cognitive function scores,” Allen said.