Hong Kong requested that Google remove a protest song from its top search results for Hong Kong’s national anthem and replace it with China’s national anthem, but the request was denied, the city’s security chief said Monday.
Hong Kong’s security secretary, Chris Tang, said that Google refused to change the top search results for Hong Kong’s national anthem because they were generated by an algorithm “with no human input.”
The request was made after “Glory to Hong Kong,” the unofficial anthem of Hong Kong’s 2019 pro-democracy protests, was played at the rugby match in South Korea on Nov. 13, which prompted Hong Kong to open an investigation.
Tang said that Google’s refusal to comply shows its use of “double standards” towards Hong Kong, citing Google’s recent approval of a ruling by the European Union’s top court allowing users in Europe to remove search results deemed incorrect.
“The [Hong Kong Special Administrative Region] government will take every measure to get Google to correct the search result,” he added.
Protest Anthem
“Glory to Hong Kong” was composed by a musician using the pseudonym Thomas with the help of Hong Kong netizens from the online forum LIHKG. It was released in 2019 when Hong Kong’s protests erupted against Beijing’s tightening control over the city.Its lyrics call for democracy and the liberation of Hong Kong. It was banned in 2020 after the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) imposed a national security law on the city to punish what the CCP defines as secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces.
But the song appeared as the top result when people searched for the Hong Kong national anthem on Google, leading to organizers at the Asian Rugby Association mistaking it for the city’s anthem.
Google’s Case in Europe
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) last week ordered Google to remove data from online search results if users can prove it is inaccurate.“The operator of a search engine must de-reference information found in the referenced content where the person requesting de-referencing proves that such information is manifestly inaccurate,” the court said on Dec. 8.
Judges said such proof does not have to come from a judicial decision against website publishers and that users only have to provide evidence that can reasonably be required of them to find.
A Google spokesperson responded by saying, “Since 2014, we’ve worked hard to implement the right to be forgotten in Europe, and to strike a sensible balance between people’s rights of access to information and privacy.”The same court in 2014 enshrined the right to be forgotten, saying that people could ask search engines like Google to remove inadequate or irrelevant information from web results appearing under searches for their names.
Reuters contributed to this report.