That is what the Eastern Theater Command of China’s People’s Liberation Army said on April 15, referring to Washington’s encouragement of Taiwan. That day, the Chinese military sent fighter and bomber aircraft as well as frigates near the island republic.
“Real actions”? Whether or not China plans to invade Taiwan now, it’s time for the United States to ditch decades of misguided policy. Among other things, Washington should, on an emergency basis, begin arming the island with the weapons it urgently needs.
The People’s Republic of China reserves for itself the right to use force to annex the Republic of China, Taiwan’s formal name.
Many analysts have surmised that the heroic Ukrainian resistance to Russian invaders has made China’s invasion of Taiwan less likely. For various reasons, few if any outsiders know how the Chinese leadership in fact views the situation.
Xi could very well decide that the Ukraine war shows he now has a green light to invade Taiwan. After all, the United States, the 27 nations of the European Union, and Great Britain—combined, these 29 states had an economy more than 25 times larger than Russia’s last year—couldn’t exercise their power to deter Vladimir Putin, so Xi may feel they will similarly fail with regard to China.
Moreover, the sanctions placed on Moscow after the invasion were not comprehensive, and they are, incredibly, still not comprehensive. Xi, therefore, could believe that no nation would dare impose meaningful costs on his magnificent state.
Finally, Xi might think Putin’s invasion has created enough chaos and distraction that others would be in no position to oppose his acts of aggression.
None of this is to say China will invade—there are many reasons why it wouldn’t—but nowhere is deterrence now more important than in the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan, after the fall of Afghanistan and the invasion of Ukraine, is considered around the world as the test of American credibility.
The United States for decades has had a policy of “strategic ambiguity,” not telling either China or Taiwan what it would do in the case of imminent conflict.
Ambiguity worked in a benign period, but, especially after the Ukraine invasion, the world is no longer in a benign period. Chinese leaders say America no longer deters them. Washington has to take them at their word, which means the United States must now adopt measures once considered extreme. As U.S. policymakers consider what to do, they must remember that three decades of misguided Taiwan policy have left them with no risk-free options.
To prevent a Chinese invasion, President Joe Biden should publicly declare that America will defend Taiwan. In addition, the United States should work with allies Japan and Australia and offer a multilateral defense treaty to Taipei.
Recognition of Taiwan would require a change in America’s one-China policy. Pursuant to that policy—often confused with Beijing’s one-China principle—the United States recognizes Beijing as the legitimate government of China. In other words, Washington has pronounced the Communist Party the winner of the Chinese Civil War. Nonetheless, America does not, like China’s one-China principle, accept Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of the People’s Republic. The United States merely acknowledges that Beijing makes that claim.
The United States instead takes the position that Taiwan’s status remains unresolved and that the resolution of the status must be peaceful, in other words, with the consent of Taiwan’s people.
To make sure the resolution of Taiwan’s status is peaceful, the Biden administration should start shipping weapons to Taiwan, especially long-range missiles that can hold China’s regime hostage.
Moreover, America and friends, to back up their words, should base forces on the island.
Deterrence is the best guarantee of peace.
The United States didn’t send sufficient weapons to Ukraine before the Feb. 24 invasion, thereby failing to maintain deterrence in Eastern Europe.
By openly bolstering Taiwan’s defenses, Washington would be declaring that America was no longer afraid of offending Beijing. That is transmitting the “right signal” for Chinese leaders to ponder.