CCP Is ‘Single Greatest Threat’ to Chinese International Students in US: Report

Almost 500 Chinese students at the University of Southern California gather in support of demonstrations held in China calling for an end to COVID-19 lockdowns in Los Angeles, on Nov. 29, 2022. Protest organizer Han Wang (L) and Hong Kong Forum–Los Angeles spokesperson Charles Lam (2nd R) spoke at the event. Emma Hsu/The Epoch Times

On campuses across the United States, international students and academics are being increasingly targeted by authoritarian governments that are thousands of miles away, according to a report from the U.S.-based nonprofit Freedom House.

“Transnational repression is an everyday threat on campuses,” the group wrote.

The report, released on Feb. 1, found that authoritarian regimes, big or small, have extended their reach outside their borders and engaged in similar acts of “transnational repression” to silence critics at U.S. universities. China’s communist regime, researchers note, represents the “single greatest threat” to international students in the United States.

“The focus on China is not without reason,” the report says. Most foreign students attending U.S. universities come from China. In 2022, American universities enrolled more than 1 million students from abroad, including 290,000 from China, according to a report from the U.S. State Department and the Institute of International Education.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a sophisticated network under its United Front Work Department (UFWD) to monitor its citizens on campuses around the world.

The UFWD is a CCP organ that the U.S. State Department described as “a sprawling worldwide network of party loyalists whose purpose is to influence local elites and community leaders.”

Researchers have said that governments in countries such as Egypt, India, Rwanda, and Saudi Arabia also pressure students and faculty at U.S. universities to stay quiet.

Instances of repression include pressuring the families of students who attended pro-democracy rallies, disrupting events on campus addressing human rights abuses by dictators, and intimidating academics who publish articles critical of foreign governments.

“These tactics not only infringe on the rights of the targeted individuals; they also spread fear and encourage self-censorship at institutions of higher learning,” analysts wrote. “Transnational repression undermines academic freedom.”

Freedom House recorded a total of 854 “direct, physical incidents”—such as assassination, kidnapping, assault, detention, or deportation—of transnational repression worldwide between 2014 and 2022, a number the group called “the tip of a much larger iceberg.” These operations were conducted by 38 governments in 91 countries.

In the United States alone, incidents involving physical assaults are “relatively uncommon,” with six cases confirmed. Other forms of transnational repression—such as online harassment, digital surveillance, and the intimidation of family members still living in an origin country—are “pervasive.”

Insufficient Response

A handful of U.S. universities have weighed in to support their students, the group found.

For instance, in 2021, a Purdue University student under threat by the Chinese regime for an online letter honoring those who demonstrated at Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in 1989 received support from Purdue’s president at the time, Mitch Daniels, who condemned the harassment and intimidation of the Chinese student as “unacceptable and unwelcome” and warned that those who censor speech on behalf of foreign entities would be subject to “significant sanction.”

However, Freedom House found that many American universities lag behind and sometimes respond counterproductively.

The report pointed to a 2022 incident at George Washington University, where administrators took down a poster protesting the Beijing Olympics on campus in response to complaints lodged by a Chinese student group who called it “incited racial hatred.” The university’s president later acknowledged these posters were “political statements,” not racist, saying that the hasty removal of the posters was a mistaken decision.

“Many colleges and universities lack the tools to protect them from ongoing threats from authoritarian regimes,” Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said in a statement.

“Administrators need to better understand what transnational repression looks like and develop strategies to protect members of the campus community”

The report highlighted the lack of a mechanism for reporting incidents of transnational repression, which analysts consider “the biggest weakness” by far in American colleges’ response. Other recommendations to address the long arms of global totalitarianism on campuses include publicly denouncing those attempts to harass and intimidate students and raising awareness among staff.

Freedom House emphasizes the need for increased attention to Beijing’s influence activities in U.S. universities, particularly the deployment of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association (CSSA) to monitor and intimidate students.

Although multiple reports have mentioned the association’s role in Beijing’s cross-border repression, administrators at U.S. universities “struggle to deal with foreign interference” by the CSSA, the group wrote.

The CSSA, with chapters at more than 100 U.S. universities, is under the control of the UFWD.

“The CSSAs, which receive funding and guidance from Chinese diplomats, not only monitor international students, but also mobilize them to take action against individuals and events who voice criticism of China’s domestic policies,” the report says.

Actions

The report was released amid rising concern about how Beijing’s influence looms over the Chinese diaspora in the United States.

On Jan. 25, Wu Xiaolei, a 25-year-old Chinese citizen and music student, was convicted on U.S. charges for stalking and threatening his fellow student who posted flyers in support of democracy in China.

The flyer, which was posted near the campus of Berklee College of Music–Boston on Oct. 22, 2022, contained the slogans “Stand With Chinese People,” “We Want Freedom,” and “We Want Democracy,” according to the charging documents.

In response, Mr. Wu sent threatening messages to the activist. He also said he had already reported her activities to officials at China’s public security agency and that the agency would visit her family back home.

“Post more, I will chop your [expletive] hands off,” Mr. Wu told the activist in a group chat on WeChat, a Chinese social media app, according to the complaint.

After four days of trial, a federal jury in Boston found Mr. Wu guilty of one count of stalking and one count of interstate transmissions of threatening communication.

The Epoch Times previously reported that several demonstrators were assaulted in San Francisco in November 2023, when CCP leader Xi Jinping traveled to the city for the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. The attackers were pro-CCP counterprotesters, some of whom had been organized by Chinese consulates to welcome Xi.

The violence in San Francisco has prompted discussions among some lawmakers looking for ways to formally criminalize the Chinese regime’s cross-border repression. One possibility is to pass the Transnational Repression Policy Act and its companion bill in the Senate, both of which were introduced early last year.

Frank Fang contributed to this report.