A bipartisan group of lawmakers is speaking out against China’s communist regime and its attempt to export ethno-nationalism and totalitarian ideology abroad.
Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), who serves on the committee, said that he had previously misunderstood the regime’s expansionist and authoritarian ambitions, and now better understood the threat posed to the international order.
“I originally had a conception of the CCP as ruthless business people who prized stability and economic growth above all else,” Torres told NTD, sister media outlet of The Epoch Times, after the primetime hearing on Tuesday.
“I’ve come to realize that these are genuine idealists who are willing to pursue ethno-nationalism and totalitarianism, even at the expense of their own economy.”
“In some sense, that [idealism] makes them even more dangerous. It means they’re capable of even more aggression,” Torres said.
“So, Xi Jinping has done us a huge favor by revealing the true character of the CCP.”
Torres said that the CCP’s ambitions to displace the United States and reshape the world into a new, authoritarian order with China at its head, was a cause for concern for all Americans. The United States, he said, would have to compete to maintain its freedom and that of its allies and partners.
“We all have to ask ourselves a simple question: What kind of world do we wish to live in?” Torres said.
“Do we wish to live in a fundamentally free world led by the United States? Or do we wish to live in a totalitarian police state led by the Chinese Communist Party? I would argue that we should err on the side of freedom.”
CCP Exporting Totalitarianism
Select Committee Chair Mike Gallagher (R-Wisc.) spoke similarly, adding that the CCP was a much more potent threat than the Soviet Union had been during the first Cold War. Unlike the USSR, Gallagher said, the CCP had the benefit of learning from the Soviets’ downfall.“I do think [the CCP] is a far more complex and formidable threat than the Soviet Union was,” Gallagher told NTD.
“Xi Jinping has studied the demise of the Soviet Union and he is attempting to learn the lessons from that failure so that he doesn’t repeat those lessons.”
Gallagher’s comments echoed those previously made by billionaire investor and conservative donor Peter Thiel, who previously said that the CCP had learned the opposite lessons of the West regarding the end of the Cold War and had consciously chosen to pursue totalitarianism rather than liberalism.
“They learned that ... you had to get rid of the Marxism without getting rid of the Leninism, and they learned somehow the very opposite lessons of that fateful year 1989.”
Gallagher said that the technological basis of the CCP’s repressive surveillance apparatus and the regime’s business ties with the West meant that the threat was much closer to home than many Americans understood.
The strategic competition and potential conflict with communist China, he said, was not one that could be confined to Chinese shores.
“It’s my belief that what happens inside China’s borders, what happens even in Xinjiang, won’t stay there now that they’re perfecting a model of total techno-totalitarian control that they want to export around the world.”