If you’ve been a real estate investor during the past decade, you likely reaped the benefits of price appreciation. Even if you had only a minimal understanding of how to invest in real estate, you could still watch your home value consistently increase while raising your tenants’ rents every year. In the past two years, that trend has gone into overdrive. Home prices have shot up faster than ever, and we’ve witnessed record-breaking rent growth in almost every major market across the country, especially the areas that had a sudden influx of new residents.
The Great Recession: A Case Study
Fortunately, we can look to recent history to learn what happens to rents during a recession. In 2007, for example, the white-hot housing market imploded. That year, home prices dropped by an average of 1.6 percent. In 2008, home prices fell by a record 9.5 percent. This was the direct result of the market being suddenly flooded with inventory after more than six million Americans lost their homes due to foreclosure.By the fourth quarter of 2010, though, recovery was already underway. Rents rose 2.3 percent year over year, which actually was slightly higher than inflation during that same period. Of the 64 metropolitan areas surveyed, 61 of them had experienced rent increases by the end of 2010.
Demand for Rentals Increases in a Recession
In a recession, when people struggle to buy a house or are unable to stay in the house that they own, demand for rentals usually increases. According to Business Insider, in a survey of the 50 largest U.S. metropolitan areas, the percentage of those who rent was 36.1 percent in 2006, before the Great Recession. By the time the recovery was in full swing, in 2014, the percentage of renters had risen to 41.1 percent. That’s a five percentage-point jump. During that same period, homeownership declined five percentage points.Of course, there are some properties that could face difficulties if they’re in a market that has only one industry or one major employer. Yet overall, a recession does not necessarily mean a crisis for rental properties. As we stated earlier, during the Great Recession the biggest annual drop in rents was 4.1 percent. For property owners, this is nowhere near the type of disruption that would cancel out any cash flow. If the rent on a property is $1,500, for example, a reduction of 4.1 percent equates to only $61.50.
That’s hardly the type of revenue dip that would compel someone to give up owning rental properties, especially if you’d planned on holding onto your properties for long-term cash flow. Even after factoring in the setbacks of the Great Recession, rents have increased by an average of 4.17 percent every year since 2000. Also bear in mind that there is no reason to believe that the next recession will be anywhere nearly as extreme as the Great Recession. Even if it were, history shows us that rental properties are still a strong investment.
While the economic forecast may look uncertain right now, there’s no reason to panic. Instead, now is the time to hold onto your real estate investments. You’ll be thanking yourself later.