Following last month’s expansion of Twitter’s crowdsourced “fact-checking” program known as Birdwatch, content monitors will now be able to leave publicly visible notes regarding tweets, according to a recent announcement from the social media platform.
A Layer of ‘Facts’
Birdwatch is an additional layer of “facts” put on tweets that do not violate existing rules. It’s mostly for content that the company considers “misinformation,” and could range from science and politics to entertainment and random bits of information.Birdwatch notes are not written by Twitter Inc., said the company, to ensure that diverse groups of people can help identify misleading information. When contributors identify a Birdwatch note as “helpful” or “not helpful,” Twitter algorithm gives more precedence to the diversity in perspectives rather than the majority opinion.
The Musk Deal
Twitter’s deal with Elon Musk, if it goes through, will put the project’s future into question as Musk has called for stopping the censoring of free speech on the platform.A judge had approved the Tesla CEO’s request and halted an expedited trial scheduled for Oct. 17 to help the billionaire close the deal and acquire the platform for $44 billion. The judge said that the deal needs to be closed by Oct. 28 or the trial will happen in November. Twitter remains hesitant on closing the deal by that time.
Regarding censorship, and specifically about Trump, Musk called the decision on censoring the former president “flat-out stupid,” and said that “it alienated a large part of the country and did not ultimately result in Donald Trump not having a voice.”
Musk said he would “reverse the perma-ban” on Trump’s account.
Twitter’s timing in launching Birdwatch is notable, given the upcoming midterm elections.
Long considered a global “town square,” the platform gives the appearance of acting arbitrarily and autocratically in its banning of sources and content that goes in opposition to its corporate ideology, said Jeffrey McCall, professor of communications at DePauw University in Greencastle, Indiana.
“There is no question that Twitter’s free speech policies, or perhaps more accurately, lack of free speech, has diminished Twitter’s value both financially and in terms of reputation. Twitter has never been very transparent about its procedures and its credibility has taken a hit because of apparent bias and suppression,” McCall said.