Longtime ESPN SportsCenter co-anchor Sage Steele, who ruffled feathers by denouncing the company’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, has announced she’s leaving the network so that she can be less constrained in the expression of her First Amendment rights.
“Having successfully settled my case with ESPN/Disney, I have decided to leave so I can exercise my first amendment rights more freely,” she wrote in the message. “I am grateful for so many wonderful experiences over the past 16 years and am excited for my next chapter.”
ESPN said in a statement that the two had “mutually agreed to part ways” while thanking her for her “many contributions” during her 16 years at the network.
Ms. Steele, who has faced backlash for her public remarks including calling ESPN’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate “sick” and “scary,” sued both ESPN and The Walt Disney Co. for allegedly violating her contract and her free speech rights.
Details of the settlement were not immediately available.
‘Sick’ Vaccine Mandate
In her lawsuit, Ms. Steele claimed that ESPN “sidelined” her after she told a podcast that she opposed the company’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate and felt “defeated” after getting the jab so she could keep her job.“I didn’t want to do it,” she said. “But I work for a company that mandates it, and I have until Sept. 30 to get it done, or I’m out.”
In July 2021, The Walt Disney Co., which co-owns ESPN, announced its decision to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for all salaried employees and nonunion hourly workers.
Earlier in May, ESPN told its 5,500 traveling staff members that they must be fully vaccinated by Aug. 1, 2021, a move the company said aimed to ensure compliance with various vaccination regulations imposed by sporting events and venues.
“I respect everyone’s decision. I really do. But to mandate it is sick,” Ms. Steele said during the podcast. “It’s one thing with masks, and I don’t have a problem with that. It’s another thing when you force this.”
“It’s scary to me in many ways, but I have a job that I love and frankly a job that I need,” she continued, discussing her decision to get the vaccine. “I’m not surprised that it got to this point, especially with Disney, I mean a global company like that.”
Ms. Steele said during the podcast that the experience of getting the vaccine was “emotional.”
Challenging Obama’s Racial Identity
Ms. Steele also questioned former President Barack Obama’s racial identity during the same podcast with Mr. Cutler.She questioned the fact that President Obama identifies as black in light of the circumstances of his upbringing while she, on census forms, ticks boxes that identify her as biracial.
“Congratulations to the President, that’s his thing,” she said. “I think that’s fascinating considering his black dad is nowhere to be found, but his white mom and grandma raised him, but OK. You do you. I’m gonna do me.”
“When you dress like that, I’m not saying you deserve the gross comments, but you know what you’re doing when you put that outfit on, too,” Ms. Steele said. “We need to be responsible as women, too. We know what we’re doing when we put certain things on.”
After Ms. Steele made the remarks, she said ESPN removed her from “prime assignments” though the company has denied that it ever suspended her.Ms. Steele acknowledged her role in the situation in a statement: “I know my recent comments caused controversy for the company, and I apologize,” she said in a statement relayed by ESPN. “We are in the midst of an extremely challenging time that impacts all of us, and it’s more critical than ever that we communicate constructively and thoughtfully.”
The ESPN/Disney lawyers wrote in the filing that the offer should “not be construed as an admission that defendants are liable for any of the claims asserted in this action, or that plaintiff has suffered any damage as a result of any of those claims.”
“How about apologizing and treating people fairly?” Mr. Freedman said in the statement.
“Disney and ESPN clearly admit their liability by offering to pay Sage Steele more than half a million dollars for taking away her right to free speech,” Mr. Freedman stated.
“The offer misses the point. Disney cannot purchase their employee’s constitutional rights no matter how powerful they think they are.”