U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is meeting Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Monday, hours after concluding his talks with China’s top diplomat Wang Yi.
Blinken arrived in China on June 17 for the start of a two-day visit, a trip that the Biden administration seeks to maintain open lines of communication with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
According to China’s state-run media, the Xi and Blinken meeting will take place soon.
Hours earlier, Blinken and Wang shook hands and posed for photos, before the start of their closed-door meeting.
In a statement following talks with Wang, the State Department said Blinken “underscored the importance of responsibly managing the competition between the United States and the PRC [People’s Republic of China] through open channels of communication to ensure competition does not veer into conflict.”
During their talks, Wang accused the United States of having a “flawed perception” of China, resulting in the current strained bilateral relationship, according to a statement from China’s foreign ministry. Wang asked the U.S. side to “reflect deeply” and work with Beijing.
According to the Chinese statement, Wang also demanded that the United States lift its sanctions against China and support its territorial claim over Taiwan.
Concerns
On Sunday, former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster suggested that Blinken may have put the United States in a position of weakness by visiting China.“I think we’ve been so anxious to have this discussion with the Chinese and the Chinese have been really playing hard-to-get in terms of the discussion,” McMaster added. “I think what they hope with the optics of this meeting, and I’m sure Secretary Blinken is quite aware of this is, to create a perception that we’re going there to pay homage to the Chinese Communist Party.”
“I think China’s sending a message: ‘Hey, we’re in charge now. You’re finished’ to the West and to the United States,” McMaster continued. “And I think it’s indicative of what they hope to achieve … which is to create kind of an exclusionary area of primacy across the Indo-Pacific region. They’ve laid claim to the ocean in the South China Sea, for example.”
Gordon Chang, a senior fellow at the Gatestone Institute, questioned why the United States would want to maintain dialogue with China.
“Why should we try to ‘maintain communication’? #China talks when it wants to and won’t talk when it doesn’t. We should not be begging for communication,” Chang wrote on Twitter on June 18. “Begging is unnecessary and gives #Beijing leverage when it otherwise has none.”
For some, the key issue is whether Blinken has used his face-to-face meetings with CCP officials to raise concerns about China’s record of human rights violations.
“I hope in these ‘candid’ talks, Secretary Blinken brought up the genocide against Uyghurs, oppression of Hong Kong and the crushing of religious freedom and human rights by the Chinese government!” wrote Rev. Patrick Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition on Twitter on June 18.
“It would be a complete abdication of Blinken’s responsibilities if his only public human rights points in China were to press for the release of American citizens without mentioning the one million Uyghur/Turkic Muslims detained for forced indoctrination,” Roth wrote on Twitter on June 18.