A Western Australian (WA) police officer has been admitted to the hospital following an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine which saw her suffer a stroke caused by blood clots.
Currently, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) does not list blood clotting as a possible side effect of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.
Plastic surgeon and Australian Medical Association (WA) President, Dr Mark Duncan-Smith, said there was no scientific proof the Pfizer vaccine caused the stroke and at present the TGA does not list blood clots as a possible side effect of the Pfizer vaccine.
“Just because something is on social media or the internet does not mean it’s factual. And the TGA is not involved in a conspiracy and, quite simply, Pfizer is not associated with strokes or TIAs.”
Further, the analysis found that between 15-21 days after the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, the risk of stroke caused by a blood clot in the brain (ischaemic stroke) was raised by 12%.
The study did note that for those people who actually had contracted the virus, the risk of stroke was 12 times higher than the Pfizer shot from day 0 through to 28 days. The risk also doubled between days 15-21.
Aziz Sheikh, a Professor of Primary Care Research & Development and Director of the Usher Institute at The University of Edinburgh who was a co-author of the study told The Herald that the study had shown that there is a very small risk of clotting and other blood disorders following first dose COVID-19 vaccination.
“Though serious, the risk of these same outcomes is much higher following SARS-CoV-2 infection,” Sheikh said. “On balance, this analysis therefore clearly underscores the importance of getting vaccinated.
He also noted that the study advocated for “clear communication of risks and benefits.”
The police officer, Chantal Uren, said that she previously had no conditions that would normally lead to a stroke.
“So how does a healthy, fit, 37 year old have a stroke and ruptured artery to their brain only weeks after having the Pfizer vaccine, and if the doctors don’t think it’s linked then why would they book me in with a vaccine specialist.”
Uren said she expressed distress over reports that her reaction did not come from the Pfizer jab as little scientific literature was available to support the claim.
She also said she felt pressured by her workplace.
“I felt as though I didn’t really have a choice. I was worried that I would be moved out of my position which is seen as a privileged role.”
Last month, WA mandated the vaccination for over a million workers—equivalent to 75 percent of the state’s workforce—which includes police officers. But Uren said she felt terrified to line up for a second dose out of concern she would have another adverse reaction.
Since Sept. 6, residents have begun registering their interest to make a claim under the federal government’s no-fault COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme, according to a Department of Health statement issued to The Epoch Times.
The scheme—announced in late August—will cover the costs of injuries A$5,000 or above. But claimants will need to have received a vaccine approved by Australian drug regulators and suffered a recognised “adverse event.”
“The recognised side effects to the COVID-19 vaccines are included in the approved Product Information and include thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) associated (blood-clotting) with the AstraZeneca vaccine and myocarditis and pericarditis associated with the Pfizer vaccine,” a Department of Health website stated.
Individuals need to have been hospitalised for claims between A$5,000 to A$20,000 for at least one night. They must also provide medical documentation of the injury and evidence of medical costs and lost wages.