Water Companies Open to Flood of Legal Challenges After Supreme Court Ruling

Campaigners believe that the ruling on pollution of the Manchester Ship Canal will make it easier to hold water companies to account.
Water Companies Open to Flood of Legal Challenges After Supreme Court Ruling
A police officer stands in front of the Supreme Court in London on Dec. 5, 2016. (Leon Neal/Getty Images)
Evgenia Filimianova
7/2/2024
Updated:
7/2/2024
0:00
The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that owners of the Manchester Ship Canal Company are entitled to claim for sewage discharge in the waterway, setting a precedent in the industry.

A panel for Supreme Court judges ruled that existing legislation doesn’t prevent the Canal Company from bringing a claim against private sewerage undertaker United Utilities.

Serving the north west of England, United Utilities is a private company that has been in a long-running legal battle with the Canal Company. The case centres around discharges of foul water contaminated with untreated sewage into the waterway linking Manchester to the Irish Sea.

The Manchester Ship Canal Company is owned by the Peel Group, an infrastructure and property investment business, based in Manchester. Its estate extends to 13 million square feet of buildings, and over 33,000 acres of land and water.

The United Utilities sewerage network includes around 100 outfalls along the canal, from which treated waste is released into the water.

When the system operated over capacity, it discharged raw sewage into the canal, the ruling said. This could have been avoided, the court said, if United Utilities improved its infrastructure and treatment processes.

The court ruled that water and waste companies don’t have statutory authority to discharge untreated sewage into watercourses. According to the Supreme Court, the Canal Company can bring a claim in nuisance or trespass, even if there has been no negligence or deliberate misconduct on the part of United Utilities.

The latest development in the case follows judgments in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which ruled that the Canal Company had no right of action. The Canal Company then appealed to the Supreme Court, which led to the reversal of the decision.

Legal Precedent

According to Good Law Project campaigners, the ruling sets a “watershed precedent which now breaks the shield around polluting water companies.” This means that private companies are open to a potential flood of legal action.

“This is a sensational victory. It gives us stronger legal tools to turn the tide on the sewage scandal and hold water companies to account, after repeated failures from our toothless and underfunded regulators,” said Good Law Project’s interim head of legal, Jennine Walker.

The outcome the case could be a “game changer” for communities across the country, said the Environmental Law Foundation (ELF).

“Our water environments have been regularly polluted with untreated sewage, water biodiversity denuded and degraded with impunity by private water companies. This is a positive day for environmental justice, not just for the public, but for nature,” said ELF’s joint executive director, Emma Montlake.

A United Utilities spokesperson told The Epoch Times: “We are considering the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling and the clarification of the circumstances in which private owners could bring proceedings in respect of discharges.

“We understand and share people’s concerns about the need for change and we have already made an early start on an ambitious proposed £3 billion programme to improve over 400 storm overflows across the North West which would cut spills by 60 percent over the decade to 2030. These proposals form part of our business plan which is currently under consideration as part of Ofwat’s price review process.”

In 2012, Yorkshire Water and United Utilities went to the European Court of Justice with a case against a fisherman’s charity Fish Legal.

The private companies claimed that water monopolies in England were private businesses as opposed to public authorities. In that, they were to be exempt from disclosing information about the sewage they were releasing in rivers and coastal waters.

FishLegal won the case, and its implications have been “felt industry-wide,” the charity said.

In 2015, the charity won another case that secured the public’s right to obtain environmental information from privatised water companies.

The Environment Agency says sewage spills into England’s rivers and seas more than doubled in 2023, with 3.6 million hours of spills last year, compared with 1.75 million hours in 2022.

The water companies say there are good reasons for these statistics and maintain they are pumping big investment into the industry.

Evgenia Filimianova is a UK-based journalist covering a wide range of national stories, with a particular interest in UK politics, parliamentary proceedings and socioeconomic issues.