The United States has continued to educate more world leaders than the UK, according to a think tank that tracks where each country’s leaders studied.
But Britain—in second place—still ranks much higher than all other countries in the list.
“Taking the last four years of results together, we see a clear and consistent pattern: relative to the US, the UK’s position has deteriorated each year,” HEPI said.
Soft Power
When a country has educated a high number of people who subsequently lead their own countries, this is equated to the educational host country having influence or “soft power” in the leader’s home country, HEPI explained.This can then bring diplomatic and trade benefits to the country where the leader was educated.
The “UK’s restrictive approach to international students since 2010” has played a part in the UK slipping in the rankings, Hillman said.
“The situation reflects the policy environment in place before this year, when some other countries were keener than the UK to succeed in the competitive task of recruiting international students,” he said.
“Things are now changing,“ Hillman said, citing a ”commitment to refresh” the International Education Strategy, with the June appointment of University of Exeter former vice-chancellor Sir Steve Smith as International Education Champion and the two-year post-study work visas made available to foreign students from last year.
Britain, at 57 world leaders educated compared to 62 for the United States, is still second highest this year globally for educating leaders at university level, or the equivalent, and remains far ahead of the next three highest countries—France who educated 35 world leaders, Russia who educated 10, and Australia, who also educated 10.
All 27 EU countries put together, who educated 60 serving world leaders, were only three ahead of the UK, according to the HEPI report, which looked at the leaders of 195 countries recognized by the United Nations.