Australian officials and diplomatic agents are pushing back against a bill proposed in the United States, which seeks to impose strict penalties on the importation of kangaroo leather or meat into America—the second-biggest buyer of kangaroo products after Europe—which generates $80 million per year in revenue.
The bill is being led by two congressmen, Salud Carbajal (D-California) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania) who introduced the “Kangaroo Protection Act” bill into the U.S. House of Representatives in January. So far six Democrats and two Republicans have sponsored the bill.
All of the species mentioned by the coalition are recognised as endangered species globally. The kangaroo, however, is not.
King argued that kangaroos are far from being a threatened species and their population is so extensive that it needs to be controlled.
“Kangaroos may look cute and cuddly but they can do immense amounts of damage to farmers’ properties,” King said. “Even if there were no commercial industry, conservation culling would occur anyway to avoid overpopulation and mass starvation during droughts.”
Agriculture Minister David Littleproud has denounced the claims that culls are cruel as an abhorrent lie without basis in science.
Littleproud said the government had invited the congressmen to visit Australia to understand how the industry works and the reasons behind it.
However, Wayne Pacelle, the president of Centre for a Humane Economy, said Littleproud was wrong.
“Minister Littleproud claims animal cruelty is not acceptable,” he told AAP on Wednesday. “Has he seen the joeys’ heads being bludgeoned on the truck bumpers as called for in the official government guidelines?”
The word kangaroo comes from the Aboriginal word “gangarru” (pron. gung-ga-rroo), from the language of the Guugu Yimidhirr people of southeast Cape York Penninsula. It was noted during Captain James Cook’s travels, when his ship ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef off the coast of what is now known as Cooktown, in June 1770.