The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a lesson to Australian leaders on the need for energy independence and should spark the development of its nuclear energy industry, according to Australian Senate candidate Campbell Newman.
The former Queensland premier and now-candidate for the Liberal Democrats was also critical of tech billionaire and green activist Mike Cannon-Brookes’ attempts to continue calling for more renewable technology as a means to shore up Australia’s energy sovereignty.
Newman said the slow response by European leaders to Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine was in part due to an over-reliance on Russian energy sources, which they were reluctant to disrupt.
“I believe very strongly that one of the big reasons that Putin has gambled on this is because he thought that the energy dependence of Western Europe, particularly Germany, meant they wouldn’t oppose him,” he told The Epoch Times. “He thought he had them on the energy issue, and he does have them on the energy issue.”
“If we then turn to Australia, we have plentiful fossil fuel resources, which the green movement and indeed now sadly, large sections of the (Australian) Labor Party and potentially the [governing Liberal-National] Coalition want to shut down while not even being prepared to embrace nuclear power.”
The former engineer said Australia’s abundance of gas, coal, and uranium should make it the producer of the “cheapest baseload electricity in the world.”
Yet, ongoing concerns have been raised that the move to renewable energy such as wind and solar will prove costly and end up being an unreliable source of electricity.
National energy sovereignty has come under the spotlight amid increasing threats to global supply chains in recent times.
Meanwhile, the Ukraine crisis has led tech billionaire and Atlassian co-founder, Mike Cannon-Brookes, to claim that if European nations had a heavier reliance on renewable energy, it would have freed them from their dependence on Russia.
Steve Baxter, tech investor and star of Australia’s Shark Tank television series, responded to the move saying Cannon-Brookes needed to prove it was viable.
“I have no problem with it unless on their path to this clean energy utopia they need the government to tilt the field in their favour,” he told The Epoch Times in an email.
“This could be more or continued energy subsidies for green energy, requirements for transmission investments that favour unreliable energy projects over others, and in general anything that requires the government to favour any interference in the energy market.”
Newman meanwhile said the bid was not driven by an altruistic motivation based on climate change action, but was in fact driven by profit.
“When someone’s making money, I would suggest in this case that the Australian people are going to be worse off and lose money,” he said.
Newman also pointed out that Australia’s renewable energy industry was still heavily reliant on Chinese manufacturing.
“If he’s advocating for solar panels to be purchased from the People’s Republic of China, then I fail see how that provides energy reliability,” he added.
“My challenge to Cannon-Brookes is to put your money into producing solar panels here in this country—it has to be a big plant to provide our needs and employ Australians here—not import stuff, all the stuff has to be made here.”