The Liberal government needs to rethink several key policies in response to U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s upcoming administration, former Liberal Finance Minister Bill Morneau says.
Considering which policy initiatives and substantive measures can be developed to align with the priorities that the new president is likely to focus on is essential, he said.
“We should be worried. We need to be on the top of our game and think about what we can do to improve our outcomes,” Morneau said. “We'll need to ask ourselves some hard questions.”
One of those questions, Morneau said, is if Canada is headed in the right direction with its current emissions timelines. He described energy use and security as critical policies for the Trudeau government to consider to prepare for a Trump presidency.
“We’re going to need to think about whether we focus on energy security in a way that makes us clearly an important part of the U.S. sector,” he said. “And that means we have to ask ourselves, is it really the right time for caps on emissions.”
Morneau said Canada’s energy initiatives deserve more scrutiny.
“[Do] we need to be moving really fast on carbon capture and sequestration at the same time?” he said.
Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault said the measures were necessary because oil and gas sector accounts for a third of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions. Both Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada’s primary oil and gas producers, say the cap would hurt their respective economies. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith maintains that the cap violates the Canadian constitution and has said her province is “actively” considering a constitutional challenge.
Ottawa has also implemented carbon pricing, which places a tax on carbon-emitting fuels. Introduced in 2019, the tax is billed as a way to encourage Canadians to change their behaviour to reduce emissions by using other energy sources.Defence Spending
Canada also needs to reassess its stance on its defence spending targets, Morneau said.All NATO allies, including Canada, renewed their pledge last summer to spend at least 2 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) on defence. The number of countries expected to meet that goal this year has risen to 23 from 11. Canada is not among that number.
But that may not be fast enough, according to Morneau.
“We will need to think about how we get to our defence spending targets more rapidly than the government has currently laid out,” he said.
Dairy Supply Management
Canada should be “looking carefully” at its supply managed sectors and have a plan in place for upcoming discussions with the U.S., Morneau said.Supply management, particularly when it comes to the dairy sector, will be a key conversation between the two governments, Morneau noted.
The dispute centres on Canada’s distribution of its dairy tariff rate quotas—the quantities of certain dairy products that can enter Canada at lower duty levels under the terms of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement.
A dispute settlement panel launched in May 2021 largely agreed with the U.S. complaint that Canada’s dairy import quota strategy was a violation of the terms of the free trade agreement.
A second settlement panel last year rejected complaints from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office that Canada unfairly favours processors over producers.
Digital Services Tax
Canada may also want to reconsider its stance on the digital services tax (DST), Morneau said. The DST was implemented on June 28 following an order in council by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland.“Should we really move forward on a digital services tax on technology, when technology is going to be a critical issue for the U.S. to stay in the ascendancy,” Morneau asked. “We need to think about how we align with the US in the technology sector.”
Morneau said all four policies—the digital services tax, defence, energy, and dairy supply—will be key in upcoming discussions with the U.S.
“These are hard policy choices,” he said. “I think they’re the right things to be putting on the table to think about now. It’s not only about having great relationships, it’s also about the substance of what we’re actually going to do to be a good partner to the United States.”