Teals MP Endorses ‘Carbon Pricing’ Amid Economists’ Call for Carbon Tax Levy

Leading economists Ross Garnaut and Rod Sims have proposed a carbon solution levy to raise $100 billion for clean energy.
Teals MP Endorses ‘Carbon Pricing’ Amid Economists’ Call for Carbon Tax Levy
A wind turbine at Albany Wind Farm at sunset in Albany, Western Australia, on Jan. 22, 2024. Susan Mortimer/The Epoch Times
Monica O’Shea
Updated:
0:00

Teals Federal MP Allegra Spender has thrown her support behind “carbon pricing” for Australia after leading economists proposed a fossil fuel tax.

Ross Garnaut and Rod Sims, who founded the Superpower Institute, propose a carbon tax known as the “carbon solutions levy” before 2031 that would raise more than $100 billion a year for clean energy.

Under the proposal (pdf), a carbon solution levy would be payable on all emissions from fossil fuels wherever they occur in the world.

Ms. Spender said broad tax reform is required, and this should include a carbon price and halting fossil fuel support.

“We need broad tax reform and I believe everything should be on the table—including a future carbon price,” Ms. Spender said.

“If we are going to reduce emissions at the lowest cost, we need to stop subsiding fossil fuels and consider how carbon pricing can help accelerate our transition.”

Mr. Garnaut and Mr. Sims, who addressed the National Press Club on Feb. 14, said the global transition to net zero is Australia’s opportunity.

“It’s essentially a transfer from fossil fuel companies to the 27 million Australian population. Basic economics means you must price the damage that fossil carbon imposes on us all,” Mr. Sims said during the address.

The economists suggested the “market failure” linked to carbon emissions could be corrected with a carbon solution levy at every fossil fuel extraction site and import port in Australia.

The levy would need to be implemented by 2031 at the latest, although bringing it in earlier would “unlock” cost-of-living benefits for Australians, the economists argued.

“Success requires investing 5 percent or more of our national income in the zero-carbon industries for several decades. That sounds impossible,” Mr. Garnaut said.

“Impossible, until we recall that we invested as much in mining during the China resources boom 2002-12.”

Mr. Sims said, “securing Australia’s place in a decarbonised global economic order is a once in a century economic opportunity.”

The carbon tax would be paid at the rate of carbon permits in the European Emissions Trading Scheme, and would be “administratively simple.”

In response to the proposal, Teal MP Ms. Spender posted a Guardian article on X (formerly Twitter) that stated an Australian fossil fuel tax could raise $100 billion in the first year alone, touting the proposal as a massive opportunity for tax reform.

“Rod Sims and Ross Garnaut have shown there’s a huge opportunity for tax reform that helps transform Australia into a green energy superpower and the lower cost of living for all,” she said.

Speaking on the ABC, Ms. Spender said, “We have to have major tax reform on the agenda. I think we should be open to different forms of carbon pricing. And the reason why I say this is we have to go through a big transformation.

“But if our tax system is fighting that, if we continue to for example as we do you know, spend around $8 billion dollars a year on fossil fuel subsidies through the diesel rebate, we are not putting all our resources actually to addressing climate change as we will.”

“And I think any economists, particularly Ross Garnaut, he is one of the eminent economists in this country, will tell you that if you have a broad price on carbon it will get you there (the) cheapest.”

However, Nationals leader David Littleproud said the carbon tax idea would “destroy resources jobs and our economy.”

“This proposal also conveniently places all the burden on regional Australia, but all Australians will pay, by tearing up agricultural land with renewable projects that will drive up food prices.” he said in quotes cited by The Australian.

Australian Treasurer Rejects Carbon Tax Suggestion

Federal member for Mackellar, Sophie Scamps, also a teal, asked Treasurer Jim Chalmers if he could back a carbon levy in parliament on Feb. 14.

“Two of our nation’s most respected economists, Professors Sims and Garnaut, have today put forward a bold plan they say can lower global carbon emissions by at least six percent, would deliver much cheaper power bills, and would supercharge a new green export industry here, which would set up Australia’s prosperity in the new global economy for decades ... isn’t it time a carbon levy was back on the table?”

However, Mr. Chalmers said the government is “not up for the levy that Professor Sims and professor Garnaut proposed at the press club.

“Part of the reason for that is that we’ve found a better way—or at least an alternative way, but we feel it’s a better way—to implement what is already a comprehensive and ambitious agenda when it comes to clean energy, when it comes to climate change and when it comes to those industrial opportunities from becoming a renewable energy superpower,” Mr. Chalmers said in parliament (pdf).

“Our plan includes lifting our country’s emission reduction targets from 26 percent to 43 percent. We’ve enshrined those targets and our net zero objective in law, which sends a message to renewable energy investors around the world that Australia has changed and is open to welcoming more investment in clean energy on our shores.”

Monica O’Shea
Monica O’Shea
Author
Monica O’Shea is a reporter based in Australia. She previously worked as a reporter for Motley Fool Australia, Daily Mail Australia, and Fairfax Regional Media.
Related Topics