One of the biggest investigations ever into the way police forces in England and Wales investigate domestic abuse allegations against their own officers has found there are “systemic deficiencies” and has recommended a series of improvements.
But a joint report by the College of Policing, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Service and the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) found no evidence investigations involving serving officers were conducted any differently than other domestic abuse allegations.
The investigation examined several CWJ case studies, as well as 56 domestic abuse cases where allegations were made against a police officer.
Police Forces Need to Go ‘The Extra Mile’
The investigation found some forces needed to do more to reassure victims when the suspect worked for the police and said they needed to go “the extra mile to show that they understand the importance of protecting and demonstrating the integrity of the police response.”Several recommendations were made in the report, including that police forces should make sure domestic abuse allegations are investigated by an officer who has had no dealings with the suspect before, and if necessary bring in a neighbouring force to conduct the investigation.
It also recommended chief constables should carry out an audit of all live allegations of domestic abuse against officers and staff which finished within the last year.
The IOPC’s Director for Strategy and Impact, Kathie Cashell, said, “We hope that victims of domestic abuse will feel reassured that, as a result of this super-complaint investigation, a spotlight has been shone on the police response to police perpetrated domestic abuse, which will now be subject to greater scrutiny.”
The Centre for Women’s Justice wrote on Twitter, “Shortcomings in the super-complaint process of investigation mean that some of the most egregious accounts of corruption have not been investigated—we maintain our call for a statutory public inquiry into police perpetrated abuse.”