In a report made public on May 27, the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency also said CSIS’s dissemination of intelligence on political foreign interference was inconsistent during the last two general elections.
In addition, those who received the intelligence did not always understand its significance or how to integrate the findings into their policy analysis and decision-making.
The review examined intelligence on attempted foreign interference by China in federal democratic institutions and processes from 2018 to 2023, focusing on how the information flowed within government.
CSIS confronted a basic dilemma with respect to circulating intelligence during elections, the review agency found.
“On one hand, information about foreign interference in elections was a priority for the government, and CSIS had geared its collection apparatus toward investigating political foreign interference,” the report said.
“On the other, CSIS was sensitive to the possibility that the collection and dissemination of intelligence about elections could itself be construed as a form of election interference. A basic tension held: any action—including the dissemination of intelligence—taken by CSIS prior to or during an election must not, and must not be seen to, influence that election.”
This dynamic was known within CSIS, but “is not formally addressed in policy or guidelines,” the review agency concluded.
The consequences of not knowing who has received what information became evident in the case of intelligence related to China’s targeting of a sitting MP—evidently Conservative Michael Chong, though he is not named in the report.
In fact, neither product was the mechanism through which the minister and deputy minister of public safety were initially meant to be informed of China’s threat activities against the MP and his family, the agency discovered.
“However, the department was ”unable to account” for it.
“This is an unacceptable state of affairs,” the report said.
The intelligence review agency recommended “that, as a basic accountability mechanism, CSIS and Public Safety rigorously track and document who has received and, as appropriate, read intelligence products.”
The report said public servants and the national security and intelligence adviser sometimes did not agree on whether intelligence assessments should be shared with the political executive, resulting in two products not reaching politicians including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Under a federal protocol ushered in by the Liberals in 2019, there would be a public announcement if a panel of bureaucrats determined that an incident—or an accumulation of incidents—threatened Canada’s ability to have a free and fair election.
There was no such announcement concerning either the 2019 or 2021 general elections. In both ballots, the Liberals were returned to government with minority mandates while the Conservatives formed the official Opposition.
The intelligence review agency’s findings follow a recent interim report from a federal commission of inquiry that said foreign meddling by China did not affect the overall results of the 2019 and 2021 general elections.
In her report, commissioner Marie-Josée Hogue said while it is possible that outcomes in a small number of ridings were affected by meddling, this cannot be said with certainty.
