UK postal services regulator Ofcom has called for an overhaul of Royal Mail, amid concerns over the sustainability of the service’s long-term future.
Considering the halved volume of letters and the significant cost to Royal Mail of delivering universal service, Ofcom warned that the service will become financially non-viable in the future.
Ofcom’s Chief Executive Dame Melanie Dawes said that the postal services is “getting out of date” and “will become unsustainable” if no action is taken.
To address the risk, Ofcom has set out two options of reform: reducing the number of letter delivery days and change the speed of delivery.
Under the proposals, letters could be only delivered to households and businesses five, or even three times a week. This would require a change in primary legislation.
The second option is to slow down letter deliveries, meaning that most letters would take up to three days or longer to arrive. The next-day service will still be available for any urgent letters, Ofcom said.
Costs and Savings
In the meantime, Dame Melanie, assured that prices will remain “affordable” by retaining the cap on the price of second-class letter. The last time Ofcom set a cap on stamp prices was in 2019.If letter deliveries are reduced to five days, the Royal Mail could save £100-200 million, with the figure going up to £400—650 million in a three-day reduction scenario.
Ofcom added that if the large majority of letters were delivered within three days, the net cost savings for the service would be £150—650 million.
For the proposed changes to the letter delivery days to be implemented, lawmakers would need to change the Postal Services Act 2011. The government has, however, signalled that it wasn’t in favour of changes to the Royal Mail’s six-day service.
Need for Change
The owner of Royal Mail, International Distributions Services (IDS), has called for an urgent reform of the service.The union announced it will “produce an alternative and independent view on the future of postal services in the UK.”
Ofcom said it was a “wake-up call” for the company that “must take its responsibilities more seriously.”