Rishi Sunak Promises Legislation to Make Rwanda ‘Safe Country’ After Supreme Court Setback

The UK Supreme Court ruled the government’s Rwanda policy was unlawful but the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, said he planned to introduce legislation.
Rishi Sunak Promises Legislation to Make Rwanda ‘Safe Country’ After Supreme Court Setback
Britain's Prime Minister Rishi Sunak delivers a speech on artificial intelligence in London on Oct. 26, 2023. Peter Nicholls/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Chris Summers
Updated:
0:00

The prime minister, Rishi Sunak, has reacted to the defeat in the UK Supreme Court for his policy on illegal immigrants by pledging to introduce legislation which would make Rwanda a “safe country.”

On Wednesday five UK Supreme Court judges unanimously backed the Court of Appeal which had ruled the government’s plans to send illegal immigrants to Rwanda for the processing of their asylum applications, were unlawful.
But rather than ditch the Rwanda policy the home secretary, James Cleverly, immediately announced plans to carry on with it and said he would be upgrading the deal to an official treaty with the east African nation.
Later Mr. Sunak said the treaty with President Paul Kagame’s government in Kigali would provide legal guarantees  asylum seekers would not be sent back to their home countries by Rwanda without the agreement of the British government.

PM Wants to end Legal ‘Merry-go-Round’

Mr. Sunak said there was a “need to end the merry-go-round” whereby the government’s policy was overturned by judges.

He told a press conference in Downing Street: “I’m also announcing today that we will take the extraordinary step of introducing emergency legislation. This will enable Parliament to confirm that with our new treaty, Rwanda is safe.”

Lawyers representing people facing deportation to the African nation had argued Rwanda was an, “authoritarian, one-party state” with a “woefully deficient” asylum system.

The then Home Secretary Suella Braverman touring a building site on the outskirts of Kigali during her visit to Rwanda, on March 18, 2023. (PA)
The then Home Secretary Suella Braverman touring a building site on the outskirts of Kigali during her visit to Rwanda, on March 18, 2023. PA

Lord Reed, the president of the Supreme Court, said the “legal test” was whether there were “substantial grounds” for believing asylum seekers sent to Rwanda would be at “real risk” of being sent back to the countries they came from where they originated and where they might face “ill treatment.”

Lord Reed, sitting with Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales, said there was a risk that genuine asylum seekers would be sent back to the country from where they had fled by Rwanda.

The Supreme Court justices said there was, “evidence of a culture within Rwanda of, at best, inadequate understanding of Rwanda’s obligations under the (UN) refugee convention.”

But Mr. Sunak said the legislation which he proposed to put before Parliament would, “make clear that we will bring back anyone if ordered to do so by a court.”

Asked by journalists when the first deportation flight to Kigali would take off, he said he was aiming for “the spring.”

Mr. Sunak has to call a general election by Jan. 2025 at the latest and he clearly wants to deliver the Rwanda policy before voters go to the polls.

Mr. Cleverly’s predecessor as home secretary, Suella Braverman, said the government should introduce legislation to block off the right to challenge the policy in the European Court of Human Rights.

Sunak Plan is ‘Quite Extraordinary’

But Lord Sumption, a former Supreme Court judge who sits in the House of Lords, described the government’s plan of using a law to declare Rwanda as safe as, “constitutionally really quite extraordinary.”

Lord Sumption told the BBC Mr. Sunak’s Rwanda legislation was, “profoundly discreditable” and would, “effectively overrule a decision on the facts, on the evidence, by the highest court in the land.”

He said the government’s plan, “won’t work internationally“ and would, ”still be a breach of the government’s international law obligations.”

But, referring to Lord Sumption’s opinion, Mr. Cleverly told BBC Radio 4’s “Today” programme: “Find me two lawyers and I will give you three opinions. Lawyers argue all the time, that’s literally what they do. I have very eminent lawyers who take a different view.”

Mr. Cleverly said: “We have been working Rwandans to beef up, to strengthen, to professionalise and enhance their professional institutions, we’ve been doing this throughout this last year. The Supreme Court is only able to look at the facts as presented to the appeal court, which was 15 months ago, and we have not wasted the intervening months. We have been working extensively with the Rwandans on this very issue.”

“So we are confident that the treaty, the legally-binding treaty which is binding on both countries, will be robust, will address the issues raised by the Supreme Court – because we have been working on it for over a year,” he added.

PA Media contributed to this report.
Chris Summers
Chris Summers
Author
Chris Summers is a UK-based journalist covering a wide range of national stories, with a particular interest in crime, policing and the law.
Related Topics