Former cabinet minister Randy Boissonnault was under scrutiny about claims around his identity during his appearance at a parliamentary committee, including from an indigenous NDP MP who said his statements are “hard to believe.”
Boissonnault has come under fire for his former company bidding on federal contracts while falsely claiming to be indigenous-owned. The former minister has also faced criticism for shifting claims around his indigenous heritage.
The MP from Edmonton said to the committee his adopted family told him his great grandmother was Cree. He had previously described her in public statements as “full-blooded Cree.”
Boissonnault said he came to describe himself as a “non-status adopted Cree” after consulting with an indigenous researcher, as he sought advice on how to speak about his family’s history.
“I sincerely apologize. To be clear, I have never claimed indigenous status for myself,” he said.
NDP MP Lori Idlout, speaking in Inuktituk through a translator, first asked Boissonnault what Cree nation he said his family belonged to when he made the claims. Boissonnault said he didn’t ask his family about it.
“We didn’t talk about it a lot, but I know growing up with my great-grandmother, she wasn’t part of a nation, she married a settler,” he said.
“Anytime that I’ve seen my name associated with indigenous status, I have been quick to change that,” said Boissonnault.
Idlout raised doubts about Boissonnault’s testimony.
“There are so many publications, there are so many interviews with you, that you’ve claimed that your indigenous identity is who you are,” she said in English. “Then for you to race-shift from being Cree, from being Métis to being white, now being adopted, what you are sharing with us is hard to believe.”
Boissonnault replied he has “always tried to be consistent with who I am.”
Conservative MPs also questioned Boissonnault on his identity. Garnett Genuis asked Boissonnault why he told the committee about consulting with an indigenous researcher on his decision to refer to himself as a “non-status adopted Cree,” since the said researcher disagrees with the label.
Business Dealings
Conservatives also honed in on Boissonnault’s past business dealings during the committee meeting. For months they have suggested Boissonnault broke ethics rules by remaining involved in the management of his former business, Global Health Imports (GHI), after being re-elected to Parliament in 2021 and becoming minister.Part of their case revolves around Boissonnault’s former business partner, Stephen Anderson, repeatedly referring to a “Randy” in text messages around business operations while Boissonnault was in office. The ethics commissioner looked into the claims several times and closed the probes without releasing findings.
Boissonnault has sought to distance himself from Anderson and has accused him of acting “unethically.” He told the committee he has sought legal counsel to explore options against Anderson.
During the committee meeting, Tory MP Michael Cooper noted that GHI had claimed to be indigenous-owned to bid on federal contracts in June 2020, when Boissonault was still a partner in the company. Boissonault said the decision was Anderson’s.
“I’ve never identified as indigenous on any application form, nor have my businesses ever benefitted,” he said.
“I am not named in any of the lawsuits against the company, and the events that have been reported by the media occurred after I stepped away from the company,” he said.
Cooper pointed out that Boissonnault’s business had claimed to be indigenous-owned to bid on federal work while Boissonnault was still a 50-50 partner in the company. GHI is not listed in the federal bank of indigenous-owned businesses.
“Why did you say that all of the allegations occurred after you had left Global Health Imports,” asked Cooper. “Why did you mislead committee this morning on that?”
Boissonnault responded that “nothing could be further from the truth” and repeated having not been involved with any federal work. “I confirmed that with the ethics commissioner,” he said.