The next general election could be “seriously disrupted” by the new requirement for voters to show an accepted photo ID, a local government membership body has warned.
But workers responsible for registering electors have said that it will bring new pressures to organising the vote process.
One surveyed administrator, who worked on May elections, said it was easy to make a “catastrophic” error, given the complexity of the process.
“If because you’re focusing on voter ID, or on VAC applications you neglect to check your ballot papers properly, that’s a ballot paper that’s gone out that’s incorrect and that could be something that’s really difficult then to come back on,” the administrator told LGIU.
The Electoral Commission, however, reported high (89 percent) levels of satisfaction with the process of voting. Before election day, 87 percent of people in England knew that they would have to show an ID to vote.
Turnout
With the general election looming, the LGIU survey looked into the impact of the ID requirement on voter turnout. There is evidence that certain groups of the population would be at risk of exclusion.This includes elderly and younger electors, disabled electors, electors without English as a first language and poorer electors.
“A higher turnout election, with electors likely to be more emotionally invested, areas that have not had a chance to try voter ID yet taking their first attempt, and a whole tranche of new legislative changes, mean that the story with implementing compulsory voter ID is far from over,” Mr. Carr-West said.
In May, local authorities received £4.75 million of additional funding from the government to support communications about voter ID.
The LGIU think tank advised the government to keep advertising the voter ID requirements throughout the next local and general elections. It also called for a widened list of acceptable types of IDs.
Funding Concerns
Another area of concern among electoral workers was funding for local authorities and the recruitment of new administrators.While 88 percent of those surveyed by the LGIU said they had adequate resources during May elections, many were concerned about the long-term funding of the voter ID regulations.
One administrator said that there was not enough time or money to “feel that we had implemented voter ID well.”
Another worker said that after being “burnt out after this May’s elections,” the team was not sure how it would “survive” the next elections.