The federal government’s Bill C-15 is attracting criticism from a myriad of interest groups on public policy and legislation. Among them are advocates of more action on reconciliation, those wanting more resource sector development opportunities for indigenous communities, and those concerned about erosion of Canada’s sovereignty in seeking its own legislative and policy solutions.
Canada would officially support the declaration at the UN in 2010, but implementation at home remains elusive. In June 2019, New Democrat MP Romeo Saganash’s private member’s bill on the declaration was thwarted in the Senate, following concerns from Conservative senators that aligning Canada’s laws with UNDRIP could lead to legal and economic consequences.
Bill C-15 is the latest attempt at federal recognition. Bill Gallagher, an indigenous law expert and a critic of the proposed legislation, says UNDRIP “was not designed to support natives who have constitutionally protected rights, Charter-protected rights, and a legal winning streak of over 300 wins.”
Russell Diabo, a Kahnawake Mohawk Nation member who’s been active in indigenous politics since he was a teenager, argues that by making UNDRIP subject to existing Canadian laws under Section 35, the government is taking away the rights the declaration was designed to recognize rather than expanding them.
“Bill C-15 talks about rights of indigenous peoples but it’s relying on Section 35. The problem with that is we’ve had over 30-plus years of Supreme Court of Canada decisions … [that] said these rights are not absolute, they can be justifiably infringed for valid legislative reasons. So in other words, the ultimate title belongs to the Crown,” Diabo told The Epoch Times, adding that the legislation would lead to more trouble if it were passed.
“If there’s ongoing, distinct indigenous societies there’s going to have to be some accommodation within the Canadian federation of that kind of a recognition. Otherwise you’re going to continue to have increasing land and resource conflicts.”
Resource Development Concerns
Assembly of First Nations (AFN) Chief Perry Bellegarde argued in favour of Bill C-15 on April 13 before the parliamentary indigenous and northern affairs committee studying the legislation.Not so, Bellegarde told the committee.
“One of the most important rights we have is the right to self-determination. And that is the right to say ‘yes’ and the right to say ‘no,’ and each project should be assessed on its own merits,” he said.
“To me that’s what this bill speaks to—joint decision making, [industry and government] getting involved sooner than later, so you avoid blockades, and you avoid legal battles.”
“Opponents of resource development have weaponized a narrow interpretation of this one provision, claiming that it provides dissident groups within Indigenous communities with the authority to fight projects that actually have broad community support,” Buffalo wrote.
Potential Impact on Sovereignty
Other critics of the bill include University of Calgary professor emeritus of political science Tom Flanagan, who told The Epoch Times the legislation would encumber future lawmakers, eroding sovereignty from the inside.“[UNDRIP] explicitly says it should not be read to undermine the sovereignty of any state. … It says it doesn’t support separatism by any group to leave jurisdiction. So it doesn’t directly challenge Canadian sovereignty, but it hollows out one of the attributes of sovereignty, which is the ability to make law,” Flanagan said.
“If the bill passed and were interpreted in a certain way, it will very much limit the ability of any government to arrive at legislative solutions for resource development. And actually for other policies, too,” he added.
“We’ve been talking about resource development, but that’s only a small part where UNDRIP could have an impact. Most of it is connected with all kinds of things—language and education and health care and on and on and on.”
Testifying on April 13, AFN legal counsel Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond dismissed such criticisms as “fear-mongering,” saying Article 19 “promotes certainty” and it was up to stakeholders like government and industry to “operationalize it in a positive way.”
“The declaration as an international instrument is there to assist us to have a better discussion about the rights of indigenous people under Section 35,” she told the committee.
“There are many first nations across Canada that have fought hard to get their rights affirmed through Section 35 … [so] the idea is not in any way to limit the UN declaration. … We are creating space with this bill to breathe greater life into Section 35.”