The federal government ordered a national security review of the Chinese short-video streaming app TikTok in September 2023, but did not publicly disclose the probe.
“This is still an ongoing case. We can’t comment further because of the confidentiality provisions of the Investment Canada Act,” said a spokesperson for Innovation Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne in a statement to The Canadian Press.
The national security review was based on the expansion of a business, which the office said constituted the establishment of a new Canadian entity. It declined to provide any further details about what expansion it was reviewing.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declined to comment on the national security reviews when asked about the matter during a press conference on March 14.
Bans and Scrutiny
The TikTok app has been banned from government-issued mobile devices since Feb. 28, 2023. The decision stemmed from a review by former Chief Information Officer of Canada, Catherine Luelo, who identified the app as presenting “an unacceptable level of risk to privacy and security.”Following the federal ban, provinces and territories have also barred TikTok from government-issued devices.
In contrast to Canada’s review, the proposed U.S. bill centres on concerns that the company’s existing ownership structure poses a national security threat.
TikTok is a wholly owned subsidiary of Chinese technology firm ByteDance Ltd.
U.S. lawmakers argue that ByteDance might have to give the Chinese regime access to the data of TikTok’s U.S. users. This concern arises from Chinese national security laws, which require organizations to help with intelligence gathering efforts.
Mr. Lieber, head of TikTok’s privacy public policy for the Americas, did not give a direct answer when asked if the Chinese Communist Party can also access the user data under the requirement of its National Intelligence Law, mandating Chinese civilians and private companies to comply with and support national intelligence collection
“Is that Chinese company [ByteDance], your parent company, is it also regulated under Chinese state National Law [saying] that should the Chinese government want to access their information ... that they could do that?” Mr. Green asked.
“Well, I’m not an expert in Chinese law,” Mr. Lieber replied.