The federal Liberal government is denying that it told CBC/Radio-Canada to cut its budget by 3.3 percent, despite executives with the public broadcaster insisting that’s part of the reason they’re laying off 10 percent of their workforce.
The Treasury Board, which oversees spending in the federal budget, said that no such directive was given to the public broadcaster.
“Whatever Radio-Canada and CBC is doing is their decision,” the office of the Treasury Board president, Anita Anand, told The Canadian Press on Jan. 31.
CBC/Radio-Canada said it was given written instructions on the budget cut, but didn’t immediately respond to CP’s request to view a copy.
The Department of Canadian Heritage said it asked the Crown corporations under its purview, including the public broadcaster, to participate in an “exercise” and report on how a 3.3 percent cut could affect them.
“We asked them to show us a proposal of what a three percent reduction would look like,” said a spokesperson for Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge.
The department is adamant that it did not tell CBC that the cut was certain to happen, or instruct it to make any such reduction in its upcoming budget.
In December, the broadcaster said it would cut 800 jobs and $40 million from its production budget because of a $125-million projected shortfall for the coming fiscal year.
President and CEO Catherine Tait—along with Shaun Poulter, its executive director of strategy, public affairs and government relations—have partly attributed the shortfall to being “told” to plan for a 3.3 percent cut.
“We were told to budget a 3.3 percent cut and that’s what we’ve done,” Mr. Poulter said on Jan. 30 after a parliamentary committee hearing.
During her testimony, Ms. Tait told MPs that the 3.3 percent is a factor in the broadcaster’s financial woes, and that if its finances don’t improve, it will need to cut jobs and spending on independent productions.
About 100 positions have already been cut, including about 50 on the CBC side and 40 at Radio-Canada side, as well as 10 corporate jobs, the broadcaster said.
Both Treasury Board and Canadian Heritage said on Jan. 31 that it’s premature to talk about any requirements for the public broadcaster to tighten its purse strings.
They said the federal budget for the coming year has not been finalized—nor have plans around how to find billions in savings across government departments and agencies, along with Crown corporations.
Last summer, the Treasury Board announced it was aiming to find 3.3 percent in savings within all government departments.
Ms. Anand made the request in writing to her cabinet colleagues, but didn’t go to each organization individually asking for them to cut 3.3 percent from their budgets, her office said.
Ms. St-Onge would have received such a letter. She oversees Canadian Heritage as well as 10 Crown corporations, four departmental agencies and an administrative tribunal.
MPs across all major federal parties grilled Ms. Tait on Jan. 30 over her decision not to rule out bonuses for executives—or herself—despite the looming cuts.
She should be “shown the door,” Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said on Jan. 31.
Ms. Tait’s current mandate ends at the end of the year, and the process to replace her is already underway, Ms. St-Onge said.
On Jan. 31, Conservative heritage critic Rachael Thomas blamed “Tait’s incompetence” for a decline in CBC viewership.
A “dramatic drop in ratings” happened despite the broadcaster receiving $1.27 billion in taxpayer funds in the 2023-2024 fiscal year, Ms. Thomas said.
“Now the CBC is dropping even more programming, becoming less relevant to Canadians every passing day.”
