NSW’s $32 Billion Renewable Energy Ambition Hit With Scepticism, Stonewalling

NSW’s $32 Billion Renewable Energy Ambition Hit With Scepticism, Stonewalling
The Liddell Power Station is seen February 14, 2006 in Muswellbrook, Australia. Ian Waldie/Getty Images
Daniel Y. Teng
Updated:

Federal Energy Minister Angus Taylor has aired concerns that New South Wales’ (NSW) $32 billion renewable energy roadmap is built on “unrealistic modelling” and has called for more details over the plan.

At the same time, NSW One Nation Member of Parliament Mark Latham has been trying to stonewall the passage of the roadmap by submitting 249 proposed amendments to the state legislature on Friday.

Energy Minister Taylor told The Australian Financial Review Energy and Climate Summit that the initiative could have unintended consequences and drive up energy costs for NSW’s residents.

“I’m concerned about models and analysis, including unrealistic assumptions that don’t translate into the real world,” he told the summit.

Australia's Energy Minister Angus Taylor speaks during question time in the House of Representatives at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia. on July 4, 2019. (Tracey Nearmy/Getty Images)
Australia's Energy Minister Angus Taylor speaks during question time in the House of Representatives at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia. on July 4, 2019. Tracey Nearmy/Getty Images

“The Commonwealth would like to see the modelling behind that policy. I’m confident that we can work through it, and NSW has indicated its strong intent to get to a sensible outcome.”

Latham claims he has struggled to get access to the modelling and has tried on five separate occasions.

The Electricity Infrastructure Investment Bill 2020 was announced by NSW’s Energy Minister Matt Kean in early November.

The Bill will put into motion the Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap, which aims to replace four out of five ageing coal-fired power stations in the state, with major renewable energy sources that will be funded by the private sector (to the tune of $32 billion) by 2030.

Over 75 percent of NSW current power generation will disappear in the next 15 years with the closures of the Liddell plant in 2022-23, followed by the Vales Point B in 2029, Eraring in 2032, and Bayswater in 2035.

Hon Matt Kean MP, NSW Minister for Energy and Environment is seen arriving for the opening of the African Savannah precinct at Taronga Zoo on June 28, 2020 in Sydney, Australia. (Jenny Evans/Getty Images)
Hon Matt Kean MP, NSW Minister for Energy and Environment is seen arriving for the opening of the African Savannah precinct at Taronga Zoo on June 28, 2020 in Sydney, Australia. Jenny Evans/Getty Images

The new Roadmap estimates over 6,300 construction and 2,800 ongoing jobs will be created by 2030 in regional NSW.

Every household is also expected to save around $130 a year on their electricity bill, and small businesses can save $430 a year between 2023 and 2040.

However, the federal energy minister’s concerns stem from earlier experiences in Victoria, after it closed the Hazlewood coal-fired power station, which sent wholesale energy prices up by 30 percent on average.

The federal government in September announced its own measures to address the impending closure of the Liddell station, promising to step in and build a gas power plant if private companies do not replace the 1,000 megawatts of power expected to disappear with the closure of Liddell.

One Nation’s Mark Latham has called the NSW government’s plan the “biggest economic reform” in half a century.

Latham said the plan essentially moves the state away from the traditional market-based model of energy provision, to one where the government plays a direct role.

Mark Latham, former Leader of the Federal Labor Party from 2003 - 2005, Mark Latham now works as a journalist and political commentator. October 5, 2017, in Sydney, Australia. (Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)
Mark Latham, former Leader of the Federal Labor Party from 2003 - 2005, Mark Latham now works as a journalist and political commentator. October 5, 2017, in Sydney, Australia. Cameron Spencer/Getty Images
“You need absolute scrutiny of something that is essentially a command and control Soviet style model to have renewable energy and nothing else,” Latham told Sky News Australia.

“This would make Joe Stalin blush in terms of its economics,” he continued. “For a party that once believed in market economics, to adopt a Soviet-five 20 year plan model of energy provision in itself is a disgrace.”

Latham’s 249 amendments are expected to prolong debate of the Bill by 83 hours.
Daniel Y. Teng
Daniel Y. Teng
Writer
Daniel Y. Teng is based in Brisbane, Australia. He focuses on national affairs including federal politics, COVID-19 response, and Australia-China relations. Got a tip? Contact him at [email protected].
twitter
Related Topics