Orders in council made public this week show that Johnston will receive between $1,400 and $1,600 per day while working on a part-time basis, over a term expected to end in December.
Trudeau’s office had previously announced that Johnston would have access to classified national-security documents during his tenure, that he would report on whether a public inquiry is needed by May 23, that he would provide regular reports to Trudeau and that he would release his final conclusions by the end of October.
His mandate includes assessing the extent and impact of foreign interference in Canada’s electoral process and reviewing the federal government’s response to threats in the past two elections, including the extent to which Trudeau was briefed.
Johnston is also tasked with making recommendations on how to address the alleged meddling.
The order-in-council documents also say that the government will pay for any travel or living expenses Johnston incurs outside his normal place of residence, as long as he stays in Canada. The cost of expert staff, “as required,” and “any other reasonable expenses” will also be covered.
His reports will be added to a growing pile of government-led reviews of foreign interference.
On Thursday, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc and clerk of the Privy Council Janice Charette delivered a report to Trudeau with updates on efforts to counter foreign interference.
That co-ordinator—a role that Trudeau announced in March alongside that of the special rapporteur—will also work on expanding briefing mechanisms with provincial, territorial, municipal and Indigenous officials, the report said.
MPs from the procedure and House affairs committee have sent a letter to Charette, who is Canada’s top civil servant, following up on their previous request for answers.
Jody Thomas, the prime minister’s national security adviser, told the committee early last month that she would disclose the dates when Trudeau received intelligence briefings about alleged meddling in Canadian elections.
But the letter’s signatories say no such information has been provided, and they are accusing officials of a deliberate effort to obstruct the committee’s study of foreign interference.
They say they would like to receive the information prior to the upcoming testimony of the prime minister’s chief of staff, Katie Telford, who is slated to appear before the committee sometime next week.