The agreement stipulates that the government deliver dental care to children under age 12 who meet the criteria by the end of this year.
Rather than launch a full-fledged program, the government opted to deliver cheques directly to qualifying families. The new benefit provides up to $650 for each eligible child, and is based on their family’s income.
To access the money, families with a household income of less than $90,000 need to attest that their child does not have access to private dental coverage, they will have out-of-pocked dental expenses they plan to use the money for, and they will be able to show receipts.
The government announced the benefit would be a “first stage,” while a more comprehensive program is developed.
Singh said his party agreed to the benefit plan on condition the full program be ready for the next phase of qualifying patients by the end of next year.
The program is supposed to extend to all kids under 18, people with disabilities and seniors by the end of 2023, and apply to all members of qualifying families by 2025.
“It’s got to be the full, federally administered program by 2023,” Singh said.
The health minister’s office said in a statement that the government continues to work with partners, including provinces and territories, to improve access to dental care, and more details will come “in due course.”
The fact that the government is taking extra time to get the program right is good news, said Carlos Quiñonez, vice-dean and director of dentistry at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry at Western University.
“Best case scenario, for me, would be if there was a significant runway—one, two, even three years—to sort of think through all of the things that will need to be considered in order to achieve a likelihood of success for such a plan,” said Quiñonez, who was consulted by the federal government.
For one thing, the government will need to carefully work out how to deliver dental care to uninsured people without disturbing what is “ostensibly, a relatively good system,” he said.
“We want to make sure that quality of life is the top notch: best quality and the best practices,” Singh said, recognizing that some services would fall outside of that scope.
That balance can be difficult to find, though, Quiñonez said.
“To me, that’s a very important issue because it not only has to be scientifically defensible, it also has to be ethically defensible.”
It’s difficult to make hard-set rules about how many cleanings someone is entitled to per year, for example, because people with greater oral health needs might need more care, he said. “These are exactly the reasons why I think it’s prudent to take some time and really think through what the implications of all of this are.”
Those questions are further complicated when one considers the way health and esthetics have become entwined in dentistry, said Catherine Carstairs, a professor in the department of history at the University of Guelph and author of The Smile Gap: a history of oral health and social inequality.
“I think it is hard in dentistry to distinguish between what’s a need and what’s seen to be cosmetic because there’s really quite a blending there.”
Carstairs said she was disappointed by the recently introduced benefit program, but still has high hopes for what the federal government can achieve in time.
“It’s not really going to go very far toward addressing the needs that people have,” she said. “But I’m still pleased to see that the program seems to be proceeding in some capacity.”
Legislation to enable the benefit payments is expected to be tabled in the House of Commons soon as MPs officially return from their summer break.
