The more than US$3-billion settlement TD Bank Group has reached with U.S. regulators for its failures to oversee money laundering risks has underlined what some say are relatively weak enforcement options in Canada.
Denis Meunier, president of DMeunier Consulting Inc. and a former deputy director of Fintrac, said fines in Canada have to increase significantly to provide adequate deterrence and not become just a cost of doing business.
He says the federal government should add substantial fines for gross negligence, and increase the existing administrative penalties as fines in Canada haven’t risen since 2008.
“It’s time we take off the kid gloves,” said Meunier. “You need penalties to punish, to really send a message: we’re serious. And these penalties should be in the millions and potentially billions of dollars.”
In Canada, Fintrac can level a maximum fine of $500,000 for each very serious reporting violation, or it can refer violations to potential criminal prosecution.
In contrast, the massive fine announced last week against TD came in part from U.S. rules that allow regulators to fine banks up to US$500,000 for each day they lack a functioning anti-money laundering program.
The limited fines available to Fintrac means the $9.2 million penalty it imposed on TD earlier this year was the largest it had ever issued.
Along with increasing fines, Meunier said he'd like to see increased resources and efforts to retain expertise at regulators, since it’s hard to compete against what’s offered in the private sector.
TD, for example, earlier this year hired Nathalie Martineau, a former executive from Fintrac, as its vice-president of anti-money laundering governance at the bank.
Finally, Meunier says he'd like to see Fintrac get the power to impose conditions on banks, as U.S. regulators have done with the cap on TD’s asset growth south of the border.
The federal government is looking into ways to improve and strengthen Canada’s anti-money laundering regime, including through public consultations last year. Earlier this year, it also boosted regulatory requirements for several non-bank entities like casinos and title insurers.
The efforts come as regulators themselves also acknowledge the size of the problem.
Peter Routledge, head of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, speaking at a risk conference earlier in October, said the agency is having to look closer at the issue.
“It’s a risk that is more significant than I appreciated three years ago when I started the job,” said Routledge.
“In the last year, the incidence of anti-money laundering issues has caused us to elevate that risk. And it’s not a single event, there have been a bunch of events that have caused us to think about that.”
