A 31-year-old man said he spent five months in a maximum security prison after his ex-girlfriend falsely accused him of rape, according to a report.
Australian Daniel Jones, of Canberra, said he was accused of rape and assault by Sarah Jane Parkinson in 2014.
“I‘d just built a house and she’d moved in with me, everything was going well,” Jones said. “I had everything going right… and in that instant, everything just went to [expletive],” he added.
Parkinson worked at the local Queanbeyan Police Station, and she told her colleagues that Jones abused her.
Jones, a former prison guard, described his former girlfriend as “a lying, vindictive, cancerous woman.”
This year, Parkinson was sentenced to three years in prison for making false statements.
When police went to her home in 2014, she had a head injury, which police found was falsified. Her jeans were also undone.
Court documents also showed that Jones was at his parents’ house with others at the time of the alleged incident.
In January, Jones read out an impact statement, “There were times when I considered ending it all.”
Another Woman Jailed
A British woman was handed a 10-year prison sentence in 2017 for making a string of false rape allegations and sexual assault claims has lost an appeal, according to reports last month.Jemma Beale, from Hounslow, West London, claimed she was raped by nine men and sexually assaulted by six during four incidents over the course of three years.
Gillian Jones, a lawyer representing Beale, told the Court of Appeals that the “danger of assumptions, myths, and stereotypes” surrounding victims of offenses, according to The Times.
“The learned judge erred because he failed to give a direction about the dangers of myths and stereotypes,” Jones said. “She was the subject of extensive media scrutiny in which she was vilified. The effect of which might have been to further prejudice the jury in the absence of such a direction.”
Jones added: “This reporting compounded or could have compounded these myths and stereotypes which were never corrected by way of judicial guidance to the jury.”