A national women’s group has launched a lawsuit against the federal government in a bid to end the practice of housing trans-identifying male prisoners in federal prisons with female inmates.
That change enabled “gender diverse” inmates to seek placement in correctional facilities that align with their gender identity. Before that, males who had yet to complete sex reassignment surgery could not be transferred to a women’s facility.
CAWSBAR argues that Corrections Canada’s policy violates several sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The group also says it endangers women and constitutes a form of “cruel and unusual punishment.”
“We initiated this action to highlight the federal government’s failure to protect women and to raise public awareness about the cruel and unusual punishment that incarcerated women endure as a result of this transfer policy,” said Mason, a former inmate at the Grand Valley Institution for Women in Kitchener, Ont., in a JCCF release.
Corrections Canada declined to comment about the lawsuit saying the matter is before the courts, but said that all offenders, including those with diverse gender identities, are placed in the best environment for their security requirements.
Statement of Claim
The organization points to various occurrences of physical and mental harm endured by female inmates who have been forcibly housed with violent trans-identifying males. Reports indicate incidents of sexual assault, harassment, beatings, stalking, and grooming.“Female Inmates have been sexually assaulted by Trans-identifying Male Inmates both with and without male genitalia,” the statement of claim says. “In addition to the inherent trauma and harm associated with such incidents, Female Inmates are also exposed to increased risks of pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.”
CAWSBAR reports that many incarcerated women have prior experiences of abuse and trauma, and the current policy intensifies their distress, potentially resulting in PTSD, depression, anxiety, and suicidal tendencies.
Women not directly targeted also suffer from “a loss of privacy and dignity knowing that a Biological Male can see them in a state of undress,” the group said.
The statement of claim lists the ways in which biological female and male offenders differ. It notes that female inmates are much less likely than males to have been convicted of serious violent crimes, to be repeat violent offenders, or to be convicted of a sexual offence.
Female inmates are also typically smaller and physically weaker than male inmates and represent less of a physical danger to those around them, the claim says.
Nearly 50 percent of the individuals were imprisoned for homicide-related offences, while one-third were incarcerated for sexual crimes, rates that are considerably higher than those in the general population of female inmates, the study said.
CAWSBAR argues that the existing policy suppresses the voices of female inmates, who may be apprehensive that their complaints could be labelled as “transphobic,” potentially jeopardizing their chances for parole.
Political Party Stances
With Canada in the midst of an election campaign, the Directive 100 policy could potentially be revisited under a new government.Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has previously criticized the existing policy and has pledged to reform it if a Conservative government is elected.