Japanese authorities have broken their silence on the escape from their country of former Nissan boss Carlos Ghosn, dismissing claims that what motivated his dramatic bail-jump was fear that he wouldn’t get a fair trial.
Ghosn is believed to have flown from the Japanese city of Osaka to Istanbul, in Turkey, and then to Beirut in Lebanon.
The Charges
Ghosn was first arrested in November 2018, with part of the allegations centering around his failure to report compensation that was promised to him. The former executive said those payments were never decided on.Other charges of breach of trust involve Nissan money allegedly diverted to Ghosn for personal gain, including payments in Oman and Saudi Arabia. Ghosn said those payments were for legitimate services.
Japanese prosecutors have released few specifics about his charges, saying they would do so at the trial. If convicted on all counts, Ghosn could face the maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.
Ghosn has repeatedly asserted his innocence, saying Japanese authorities trumped up charges against him to prevent a possible fuller merger between Nissan Motor Co. and Renault.
‘Rigged’ Justice System
In a statement Tuesday, he said he fled to avoid “political persecution” by a “rigged Japanese justice system.” He has promised to speak with reporters next week.Japan’s Justice Minister dismissed claims that Ghosn’s ability to receive a fair trial in Japan was impaired.
The escape has embarrassed Japanese authorities and left them scrambling to defend the country’s justice system.
The conviction rate in Japan is higher than 99% and authorities can hold suspects almost indefinitely while pending trial. Japanese authorities have argued that lengthy detentions are justified to collect evidence and build a solid case against defendants.
“Therefore it was necessary and unavoidable to detain the defendant Ghosn in order to continue fair and appropriate criminal proceedings,” prosecutors said in a statement cited by The Japan Times.
Japanese prosecutors cited by The Japan Times insisted that by escaping the country, he had broken his promise to appear before the court and “refused to obey the judgment of our nation’s court.”
“He wanted to escape punishment for his own crime. There is no way to justify this act,” they said.