In the countdown to the Quebec election on Oct. 3, Premier François Legault has been pressing harder on the hot-button issues of immigration and cultural preservation, saying this week that accepting more immigrants would be “suicidal” for the French language.
“As long as we haven’t stopped the decline of French, I think that for the Quebecois nation that wants to protect French it would be a bit suicidal to increase [the immigration threshold]”, Legault said during a talk before the Montreal Chamber of Commerce on Sept. 28.
Meanwhile, Immigration Minister Jean Boulet made waves after he said during a local election debate that “80 percent” of immigrants don’t work.
“Eighty percent of immigrants go to Montreal, don’t work, don’t speak French, or don’t adhere to the values of Quebec’s society,” Boulet said.
The question of how to protect French while at the same time welcome immigrants was posed to party leaders during the second and final election debate on Sept. 22.
Legault, the leader of the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ), said the “first job of the premier of Quebec is to ensure the future of French” and that doing so requires fewer non-Francophone immigrants.
Liberal Leader Dominque Anglade told Legault he should stop “pointing fingers, stop dividing, stop saying that immigration is a problem or a threat.” Anglade, a former CAQ candidate and party president, left the party in 2015 due to its stances on identity and immigration.
The two also clashed on Sept. 7. At a campaign event, Legault discussed the “challenges of integration” and confirmed his intentions to limit immigration to 50,000 people annually. “Quebecers are peaceful,” he said. “They don’t like bickering, they don’t like extremists, they don’t like violence. We have to ensure that we keep it the way it is right now.”
French Perceived as ‘Fragile’
Yannick Dufresne, a political scientist at Laval University, says the clash between the benefits and risks of immigration is at the forefront in Quebec because French is perceived as “fragile” on a continent dominated by English.“All the parties accept that, and maybe we’re the first ones because of our status as a language minority to realize that and to be forced into this awkward type of discussion. It’s very charged emotionally and ideologically,” Dufresne told The Epoch Times.
“If we don’t accept more immigrants, then we will lose our proportion in the country. But if we accept them, and we don’t integrate them well to the French, then what are we doing? It’s a challenge for [party leaders], and to choose an answer is a very, very difficult choice.”
The Parti Québécois is the only party calling for reduced immigration, suggesting 35,000 annually.
Federal Context
Federally, the Liberal government wants to bring in 450,000 immigrants annually, which means that for Quebec to maintain birthrates but keep its current share of the Canadian population, it would have to increase immigration past 115,000. However, English Canada is nervous about having that many immigrants as well.When asked why mainstream Quebec parties could have debates on immigration that English Canada could not, University of Winnipeg political science professor Malcolm Bird said Quebec politicians better represent a spectrum of valid considerations.
“Immigration is a sensitive issue, but it’s also very important,” he said.
“Anytime you’re bringing people into our country, you’re altering the labour market, and depending on where you are in the labour market, immigration can be a good thing, it can be an OK thing, and for many people can be a bad thing. There shouldn’t be anything wrong with saying that. For much of the left’s existence, they were critical of immigration because it brought more labourers into the labour market.”
Immigration has fewer downsides in a labour shortage, but its upside to solving later shortages also has limits. Conservative leader Eric Duhaime spoke of this at a press conference on Sept. 5.
Bird says an open market could handle the influx better, but housing regulations have hindered supply from reaching higher demand. The result is higher prices.
Policy Stances
The issue of religious accommodation also plays into policy stances. In 2019, Legault’s CAQ government passed Bill 21, which prohibits some public-sector workers in positions of authority, such as police and teachers, from wearing religious symbols in the workplace. The Quebec Conservative and PQ leaders support this bill, while the Liberals and QS are opposed.The Conservative Party of Quebec said a Conservative government “will select permanent immigrants on the basis of their civilizational compatibility” that adheres to “Western values” and the “ability to integrate into Quebec culture.”
Duhaime has said employability, values, and language proficiency in French are more important considerations than numbers.
“A person who comes here and does not work, it is not a success either for him or for the host society,” he said, adding that “I think we need to make sure that there are no people who think that there are religious texts that are above our laws in Quebec.”