Hundreds of thousands of UK teenagers got their A-level exam results on Thursday despite not having sat any summer term exams, which were canceled due to the CCP virus pandemic.
The grading system, based on mock exams and teachers’ rankings, has produced higher grades than expected for some A-level students, with a 2.4 percent increase in students getting grade A’s in England.
The grading and standardization process has met with criticism from teaching leaders, however, who have complained that it has not been fair to many students receiving lower than expected grades.
Teachers had followed the guidance and made every effort to submit accurate data about students, he said, but had given the ASCL “heartbreaking feedback” about resulting grades that had been “pulled down” and were “utterly unfair and unfathomable.”
Calculated Grades
Following a government announcement in March, a contingency system to award “calculated grades” was devised by Ofqual working with exam boards.Teachers were asked to submit a “centre assessed grade” (CAG) for each student based on his or her prior performance in school or college.
A standardization process by Ofqual was then undertaken before grades were finally awarded.
Student Reaction
Thursday’s exam results could be accessed online, but many students chose to go into school to get their results with friends.One of those, Phillip, an 18-year-old A-level student at Latymer Upper School in Hammersmith, London, said he was happy to have achieved the four A*’s he had hoped for and is set to study engineering at Cambridge University.
He said that some of his friends, however, didn’t get the grades they thought they deserved.
According to his teachers, downgrading had been an issue this year, and grade distribution had not been comparable to the last two or three years, Phillip said.
“It’s a tough one,” he told The Epoch Times.
“Even if you sit the exams and you make a couple of mistakes you might not get the grades you want because of a grade boundary—you might get an A instead of an A*.
“At the end of the day, there is no 100 percent accurate way of gauging how good a student actually is at their subject.”
Criticism
A survey by the Sixth Form Colleges Association said that 96 percent of sixth form college heads reported that the grades students received were “lower or much lower” than the CAG’s given by teachers. Some said up to two-thirds of the grades were downgraded.He called for the system to be scrapped as a “failed experiment” and for grades to be based purely on the CAG’s submitted by teachers.
The grading has also met with criticism from Labour politicians.
“The Government needs to urgently rethink. We need to guarantee the right to individual appeals, the fee for appeals waived and nothing to be ruled out, including the U-turn that was forced on the Scottish Government.”
The Ofqual grading system operates in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland only.
Appeals Process
The government have built in a “triple-lock” appeals process for those students who are unhappy with their results.“No one wanted to cancel exams—they are the best form of assessment, but the disruption caused by Covid-19 meant they were not possible,” Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said.
“For a lot of pupils, the algorithm doesn’t even consider what our own teachers predicted we’d get. There isn’t a proper appeals process. Worst of all, pupils from poorer schools, with lower results historically, are due to get automatically marked down by the software,” he says in the petition on Change.org