Under the acts care providers must consider each individual’s personal needs, which should be assessed separately from anyone else’s.
John’s Campaign said in an emailed statement, however, that the government guidance “fails to accurately express the law and to advise care homes on their legal obligations to people aged over 65.”
‘Effectively Imprisoned’
“People living in care homes have been effectively imprisoned and denied these simple pleasures with the sanction of two weeks in isolation should they step outside the gates,” Julia Jones and Nicci Gerard, co-leaders of the campaign’s challenge said.“Now they are told that only those under 65 may be considered eligible for the freedoms enjoyed routinely by the rest of the population. And if they do accept an invitation, they must be confined to their rooms for 14 days on return!”
“This is outrageous. Will care home staff who have enjoyed Christmas with their families be self-isolating for 14 days before they return to work?” they asked.
Protracted Suspension of Visits
John’s Campaign credits itself with having already changed the government’s mind on care home visiting restrictions amid the pandemic.The campaign’s lawyer, Tessa Gregory of Leigh Day, however, said that it “once again considers the Government has published care home guidance which unlawfully ignores the requirement for individual risk assessments and applies arbitrary restrictions, this time on visits out for residents.”
Asked to comment on the challenge, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson declined to comment on any potential legal action.
He said however that the government is “making it possible for more care home residents to spend time with loved ones over the Christmas period, through the rollout of rapid testing in care homes.”
“The measures for this Christmas have been agreed UK-wide based on scientific and clinical advice on how best to minimise the risks,” he said.