Breaking Judge Explains Why Australian Breakdancer Scored Zeros

Breaking head judge Martin Gilian clarified that her score wasn’t indicative of failure, while Prime Minister Albanese offered his support.
Breaking Judge Explains Why Australian Breakdancer Scored Zeros
B-Girl Raygun of Team Australia competes during the B-Girls Round Robin - Group B on day 14 of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 at Place de la Concorde in Paris, France on Aug. 9, 2024. (Ezra Shaw/Getty Images)
Naziya Alvi Rahman
Updated:
0:00

After going viral for her Olympic performance, Rachael Gunn found support when breaking head judge Martin Gilian, known as “MGbility,” clarified that her score wasn’t indicative of failure.

He emphasised that the breaking community “definitely stands behind her.”

Gunn, also known as “RayGun,” gained worldwide attention for scoring straight zeros in her performance at the 2024 Olympics.

“Breaking is all about originality and bringing something new to the table and representing your country or region,” said MGbility. “This is exactly what Raygun was doing. She got inspired by her surroundings, which in this case, for example, was a kangaroo.”

MGbility said there are five criteria the judges consider when making a decision, and Raygun’s level was “maybe not as high” as that of her competitors.

“But again, that doesn’t mean that she did really bad. She did her best. She won the Oceania qualifier,” he said. “Unfortunately for her, the other B-girls were better.”

At the same press conference, Sergey Nifontov, general secretary of the World Dancesport Federation, said the federation had offered support to Raygun in the wake of the strong social media response.

Gunn’s performance saw her eschew standard breakdancing moves, and instead opting to perform original moves modelled on Australian animals.

Albanese Backs ‘Raygun’

The dancer soon had the prime minister of the country speaking for her.

“Good on her and a big shout-out to her. That is in the Australian tradition of people having a go. She’s had a go representing our country and that’s a good thing,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters.

“The Olympics is about people participating in sport. That’s a good thing, and Raygun had a crack. Whether athletes have won gold medals or just done their best, that is all we ask for. It’s the participating that is really important.”

Gunn also found support from Australia’s Chef de Mission Anna Meares who publicly defended her, and highlighted her courage.

“I think that what has occurred on social media with trolls and keyboard warriors, and giving those comments airtime, has been really disappointing,” Meares said at a press conference on Aug. 10.

“Raygun is an absolutely loved member of this Olympic team. She has represented the Olympic team, and the Olympic spirit, with great enthusiasm. And I absolutely love her courage.”

Gunn, a 36-year-old university lecturer, lost all three pool matches against competitors representing the United States, France, and Lithuania in the sport’s opener at Paris’ Place de la Concorde on Aug. 9.

Later on social media, Gunn posted on the importance of individuality.

“Don’t be afraid to be different,” the post read. “Go out there and represent yourself; you never know where that’s gonna take you.”

Gunn is a top-ranking female breaker and creative arts researcher specialising in the cultural politics of breakdancing at Sydney’s Macquarie University.

She secured her place in the Games as Australia’s B-Girl delegate after winning last year’s Oceania Breaking Championships against a dancer named “Molly.”

Senator Raises Questions About University’s Priorities

Liberal Senator Gerard Rennick has questioned why an Australian university is backing research into breakdancing.

“She attended Macquarie University for her bachelor’s degree in contemporary music, graduating in 2009, and for her PhD in cultural studies, graduating in 2017. Her PhD thesis focused on ’the intersection of gender and Sydney’s breaking culture,'” the senator wrote on Facebook.

“Nothing against break dancing by the way. By all means it’s a fair recreational activity, but that’s it. It shouldn’t be subsidised,” he added. “It also begs the question—just how many obscure and pointless courses do universities offer that are subsidised by the taxpayer.”