The two scientists fired from the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg failed to disclose their interactions with Chinese entities and didn’t protect sensitive information and assets, newly released documents show.
The government tabled the long-awaited documents on Feb. 28 after years of refusing to disclose why the scientists were fired, citing privacy and national security concerns.
Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, were escorted out of the high-security lab in July 2019 and had their security clearances revoked. The couple was subsequently fired in January 2021.
According to the documents, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) assessed that Ms. Qiu repeatedly lied about her work with entities under the control of the Chinese regime. This continued even when she was presented with evidence, the documents say.
“Ms. Qiu continued to make blanket denials, feign ignorance or tell outright lies,” CSIS said, according to the documents.
Officials with the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), which oversees the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML), were in agreement with the CSIS assessment, a November 2020 document shows.
The investigators said that Ms. Qiu’s loyalty “remains of grave concern” given her interactions with entities linked to a foreign actor.
The documents also say that Mr. Cheng allowed unescorted visitors to work at the NML on at least two different occasions. As well, he didn’t prevent the unauthorized removal of the laboratory materials, a PHAC report says.
Mr. Cheng also was not forthcoming about his collaboration with members of governmental agencies “of another country, namely members of the People’s Republic of China.”
“Dr. Cheng’s actions reflect those of an individual who is careless with information and assets in his custody and not forthcoming and truthful when questioned about these communications,” the documents say.
Health Minister Mark Holland said that back in 2019, neither he nor PHAC would have been “certain” of the extent to which China was willing to go to “influence science and obtain information.”
“I think that there was an inadequate understanding of the threat of foreign interference,” Mr. Holland, whose department oversees PHAC, said at a Feb. 28 press conference.
“A lack of adherence to security protocols and procedures at the Winnipeg labs in 2019 is unacceptable.”
Commenting on the two fired scientists, the minister said they did not disclose information on the various “scientific enterprises” that they were involved in.
“Unfortunately, there were employees who were dishonest about some of their engagements,” he said, while insisting that no information that threatens the security of Canada left the country.
The Conservatives criticized the Liberal government for allowing a person who is “a very serious and credible danger” to access the high-security lab.
Work With China
While employed at the NML, Ms. Qiu travelled several times to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, helping to train the personnel at the lab on level 4 biosafety.Ms. Qiu has not responded to Epoch Times’ requests for comment.
In March 2019, while still working at the Winnipeg lab, Ms. Qiu sent samples of Ebola and Henipah viruses to the WIV. NML authorities have said the shipments were done with the proper permission after receiving assurances from the WIV that no gain-of-function research was being done on those viruses at the lab.
Documents Disclosure
It took the government four years to release the partially redacted documents on the firing of the two scientists.During the previous session of Parliament, the government took the extraordinary step of taking the Speaker of the House of Commons to court in 2021 to prevent the release of the documents. The court case was dropped after Parliament was dissolved when an election was called that year.
In the new Parliament after the 2021 election, the Liberal government initially proposed to release the documents to MPs from different parties on the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians. However, this was opposed by the Conservatives, saying that this special committee reports to the prime minister rather than to the parliamentarians.
The Liberals subsequently formed an ad hoc committee of MPs from different parties to review the documents before public disclosure.