The federal government’s plan to make Canada’s electricity generation carbon-free by 2035 is “impractical and highly unlikely” to succeed, the Fraser Institute says, noting that physical, infrastructure, financial, and regulatory realities make the plan “not feasible.”
This transition requires eliminating the remaining use of fossil fuel sources as well as expanding capacity to meet growing demands from electric vehicle adoption, population growth, and industrial electrification, the report from the study indicated.
Using data from Statistics Canada, the authors found that in 2023, nearly 81 percent of Canada’s electricity came from carbon-free sources, which included hydro (58.4 percent), nuclear (13.7 percent), wind (6.4 percent), biomass (1.5 percent) and solar (0.8 percent).
Lands Required
Using hydro power as the sole alternative to replace that remaining fossil fuel-based generation would require building approximately 23 large hydroelectric dams, similar in generation capacity to B.C’s Site C facility, or 24 projects comparable to Newfoundland and Labrador’s Muskrat Falls, the report said.“These numbers are determined by dividing 117,696 by 5,100 GWh and 4,900 GWh, which are the expected annual outputs of the Site C project and Muskrat Falls project, respectively,” stated the report.
If solely wind energy were to be used to replace that fossil fuel-based electricity, the authors calculated that Canada would need to build around 11,000 large wind turbines across the country by 2035. The calculation assumes a capacity of 3.5 megawatts per turbine and a capacity factor of 35 percent.
“[The turbines] would require approximately 7,302 square kilometres of land—larger than Prince Edward Island and nearly nine times the size of Calgary,” the co-authors wrote. “Hydropower projects would require even more land, about 26,345 square kilometers, nearly half the size of Nova Scotia.”
‘Cost Overruns’
The authors said the current process of planning and constructing major electricity generation facilities in Canada is complex and often marked by “delays, regulatory challenges, and significant cost overruns.”An example they cited is the Site C project in B.C., which took about 43 years from the initial engineering studies in 1971 to environmental certification in 2014. Site C, expected to be completed in 2025, faced cost challenges during its construction phase.
“Construction finally began in July 2015, but significant cost overruns soon emerged. By 2017, the project’s cost had risen from $8.3 billion to $10.7 billion, and by 2021, it had increased to $16 billion,” the report said.
Co-author Aliakbari says the scale of infrastructure needed to be planned, approved, financed, and built to decarbonize Canada’s electricity grid in just 10 years is “not at all realistic” given that the requirements mentioned in the report would only meet the country’s existing electricity needs.
“This doesn’t even account for the additional infrastructure needed to meet future electricity demand,” Aliakbari said.
The Epoch Times reached out to Environment and Climate Change Canada for comments but did not hear back by publication time.