Two legislative bodies of the European Union (EU) reached a tentative agreement on Feb. 20 over new rules for the voluntary certification, registration, and monitoring of carbon removals within the bloc.
The European Council and the European Parliament agreed to define and regulate permanent carbon removals, carbon farming, and carbon storage in products to address climate change, according to a statement from the council.
- Permanent carbon removal to storage for a duration of several centuries
- Temporary carbon storage in long-lasting products for a duration of at least 35 years. Example: wood-based construction
- Temporary carbon storage from carbon farming for a duration of at least five years. Examples are restored forests and soil, wetlands, and seagrass meadows
- Reduction of carbon emission from farmed soil for a duration of at least five years. Examples are wetland management, no tilling and planting cover crops such as grasses, legumes, and forbs, and reduced use of fertilizer
Benefits of Carbon Removal
Each metric ton of CO2 removed through carbon capture activities certified under the new law counts as a contribution toward the EU’s and its member states’ greenhouse gas emission reduction goals under the Paris Agreement, the statement said.The Paris Agreement requires each participating country to report to the United Nations every five years on its contributions to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The new legislation stipulates that certification and audit information must be made public. An electronic EU-wide registry will be established after four years. Fees will be charged for querying the registry, and the income from these fees will be used to fund the registry, according to the statement.
The initiative to certify carbon removal was initially proposed by the commission in November 2022. Carbon removal certificates will underpin “the exchange of verified carbon removal units through voluntary carbon offsetting markets,” the commission said in the proposal.
Certifying carbon removal will potentially create new income opportunities for industries deploying carbon removal and storage technologies and for farmers engaging in innovative carbon farming, the statement said.
Methods Have Limitations
To achieve the greenhouse gas reduction goal, many farmers worldwide need to change how they farm the land for hundreds of years in the future, which poses “a big social and economic challenge,” the MIT climate portal said.
In 2020, researchers at the University of California–San Diego studied projects commercializing carbon capture and sequestration technology in the past 20 years and concluded that 80 percent of those projects failed, according to the university’s statement.
The researchers found that the credibility of revenues and incentives which depend on policy and politics, “along with capital cost and technological readiness,” are key factors in the success of these projects. The only major incentive that the companies studied had was to recoup their investments by selling the CO2 they captured to petrochemical companies, which used it to enhance oil and gas extraction, the university said in the statement.
“Carbon capture only captures a fraction of the total emissions from the lifecycle of oil and gas production, and its long-term efficacy is questionable,” the IEEFA said.
Carbon Storage in Norway
Sleipner has been in operation since 1996 and Snohvit since 2008. Both sites, run by Norwegian state-owned energy company Equinor, store CO2 separated during natural gas production and inject it back underground.
“Storage conditions at Snohvit began deviating dramatically from design plans only about 18 months into CO2 injections, necessitating major interventions and investments. In the case of Sleipner, CO2 moved into an area previously unidentified by engineers despite extensive study of the subsurface geology,” the statement said.