Education Conference Organisers Cancel Anti-Racism Ideology Critic to ‘Prioritise Safety’

Alka Seghal Cuthbert speaking to NTD's British Thought Leaders on Oct 20 2022. Screenshot NTD/EpochTimes

Organisers of an education conference have told an educator who advocates against anti-racism ideology in schools to not take part in a panel she was invited to, amidst complaints that her presence made some attendees “feel unsafe.”

Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, who has over 30 years experience as an educator, was due to appear at a panel at the Rethinking Education Conference on Saturday, an event that aims “to improve the way we educate current and future generations.”

Mrs. Cuthbert is the director of Don’t Divide Us (DDU), an organisation set up to take a stand against the UK’s “divisive obsession with people’s racial identity.”

Mrs. Cuthbert said she was told that her panel and apprearence on the discussion of ‘indoctrination“ in schools was cancelled as ”psychological safety is a precondition for free debate.”

‘Ludicrous’

She told The Epoch Times that she was told that seven people rang to complain that they felt “psychologically hurt and distressed” at the presence of a speaker from DDU at the conference.

She said that the organiser said he had “a duty of safeguarding.”

“And I pointed out safeguarding didn’t really apply to adults, it was for adults to protect children, or vulnerable people. This was a conference of educators, adults, for teachers,” she said.

“Then he started to say, well, it was just a logistical decision as a conference organiser and that he wasn’t taking a stand and had no position on Don’t Divide Us,” she added.

“The absurdity of the psychological harm thing is really ludicrous,” she said, adding that just seven people “prevented potentially” hundreds of people from listening to her on the panel.

“Out of a panel of three speakers, it’s me, the one who is clearly most staunchly against indoctrination, and a woman of colour to boot, I’m the one who gets disinvited,” she added.

Not Feel Safe To Speak

A spokesman for Rethinking Education Conference pointed The Epoch Times to a statement by Rethinking Education Director James Mannion.

It did not respond to the claim that it said Mrs. Cuthbert was cancelled as “psychological safety is a precondition for free debate.”

The statement confirmed that it had “taken the difficult decision to ask Alka Sehgal Cuthbert not to attend the conference tomorrow.”

Mr. Mannion said that he was “prioritising the safety of our speakers and delegates.”

“In seeking to re-imagine an education system where all young people and adults can flourish and thrive, we strongly believe that we need to have difficult conversations and that people should be prepared to subject their ideas to scrutiny and challenge,” he said.

“At short notice, we have been contacted by several people—a combination of speakers and delegates—who communicated very clearly that they would not feel safe to speak at or attend the conference alongside a representative of Don’t Divide Us. When someone tells you that they feel unsafe, you need to listen,” he added.

Anti-Racist Policies

DDU has done several investigations into anti-racist policies, which they say impose new ideologies on institutions which in turn are “re-racialising” society.

It has an advisory council that includes notable figures from the debate on race and education, including Chair of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities Tony Sewell CBE, researcher and commentator Rakib Ehsan, and former editor of the Jewish Chronicle Stephen Pollard.

One report found that 48 third-party organisations working in English schools promoted critical race theory as fact.

“Once CRT is accepted as a basis for school policies, it becomes easier to treat groups of pupils differently according to skin colour, and an important part of schools’ traditional socialising role, to create a common culture through a shared effort to realise educational aims, becomes very much harder, if not impossible,” wrote the DDU.

It expressed major concerns the traditional ancient institution of the Church of England (CofE) was embracing the disputed ideology CRT as fact across its schools, by promoting the “pyramid of white supremacy” theory model to some of its schools.

Another found that almost one in four councils are critical race theory (CRT) and anti-racism led in their education policies and guidance.

It found that the vast majority (88 percent) of councils partner with third-party providers to push key concepts such as “structural racism,” “white privilege,” and “unconscious bias.”

It added that the “lack of standardisation” of where and how such materials are made available “contributes to the problem of transparency and accountability.”