Doctor Concerned With COVID Jab-Related Heart Issues to Tour Down Under

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a UK-based cardiologist, in Dallas, Texas, on Nov. 29, 2022. The Epoch Times

Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra will be touring down under to raise public awareness about the side effects and possible cardiovascular complications from the COVID-19 vaccine.

“Medical and regulatory authorities have supported unethical, coercive, and misinformed policies, undermining the principles of informed consent,” he said in a statement.

“These regrettable actions are a symptom of the medical misinformation mess—the tip of a mortality iceberg where prescribed medications are estimated to be the third most common cause of death globally.”

The Australian population is one of the most highly vaccinated in the world after state and federal authorities implemented a swathe of mandates to compel locals to accept the jab.

These include making jabs a precondition to employment, entering venues and shops, and even crossing domestic borders.

The governments now are dealing with the after-effects of such heavy intervention in society, with Australians launching compensation claims for vaccine injuries.

Dr. Malhotra is calling for all COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to be suspended until the side effects are fully investigated.

“It is our ethical duty to inform the public about these risks and ensure that they have the information they need to make informed decisions about their health,” he said.

He will tour Australia’s capital cities from May 27 and is supported by the alternative doctor’s union, the Australian Medical Professionals Society, and TNT Radio.

Heart Concerns and Big Pharma

Maholtra has previously warned that the spike protein from the vaccine, which spreads to all the vital organs of the patient, has “either a direct toxic effect to the tissues of the heart or an autoimmune reaction.”

“The most worrying aspect from my perspective as a cardiologist is that it causes an acceleration of coronary artery disease,” he told Epoch TV’s American Thought Leaders.

“What that means is there will be late effects. For example, my father had a cardiac arrest six months after having the second dose of the vaccine.

“From my perspective now looking back, that was most likely the cause of his cardiac arrest because it accelerated something that was relatively mild and became quite severe within the space of a few months. Then, it drove him to have a cardiac arrest.”

He has also called for more transparency around the efficacy of vaccines.

“It is one of willful blindness by the medical establishment and governments, who are essentially turning a blind eye to the truth about the vaccines because they want to avoid conflict and protect the prestige and reduce anxiety,” he added.

“Also, we can’t underestimate the power of these multinational corporations, big pharma in this instance, who have so much control over governments, over medical bodies, over regulators, that no one wants to take them on. That’s a big problem.”

Despite these concerns, governments are picking up the tab for liability related to COVID-19 vaccines—generally a precondition to contracting large pharmaceutical firms to create vaccines en masse.

Medical Censorship Fading

In Australia, public discourse around vaccine injuries has gained increasing recognition over the past year. During the pandemic years, however, the issue was taboo and often landed medical practitioners in hot water.

For example, North Brisbane-based Dr. William Bay was suspended after interrupting a national Australian Medical Association conference in late July 2022 and telling attendees to stop forcing vaccines on people.

In September 2021, anaesthetist Dr. Paul Oosterhuis was suspended after two “anonymous complaints” were lodged regarding his social media activity, where he questioned the efficacy of lockdowns and PCR tests.

While in June 2022, a nursing student successfully overturned a decision by her university lecturer to suspend her after she expressed doubts about the vaccine during a casual conversation at a work placement.

“To question the scientific evidence for the safety of a vaccine, so long as it is done rationally, could hardly, if ever, be regarded as contravening [the nursing Code of Conduct]. Nor would pointing to the possibility of long-term effects or the possibility of adverse effects in some clinical situations,” wrote Justice Guy Parker in his judgement.