Kelly ordered that Djokovic’s passport and all other personal effects be returned to him, with the order pronounced in open court at 5.16 p.m.
Kelly said if the government exercises its power to cancel the visa, Djokovic will not be permitted to return to Australia in three years, but it could be appealed.
He demanded that if the government decided to enact the powers, the court was entitled to be informed.
At the hearing, Kelly deemed the decision to cancel Djokovic’s visa “unreasonable" after the player had been told, at 5.20 a.m. on Jan. 6, that he could have until 8.30 a.m. to respond to officials.
The call to cancel the visa, however, happened before that deadline at 7.42 a.m., before Djokovic could use the time to “consult others” and make further submissions on his own behalf.
The government also acknowledged it had not given Djokovic enough time to make his case while he was being held after arriving in the country.
“An order for immediate release does not prevent re-detention if there is power to detain,” the submission read. The tennis player is now set to be released from immigration detainment.
However, certain discrepancies that have come to the public’s attention were not addressed at the hearing.
Tennis Australia had informed players seeking a medical exemption to apply by Dec. 10. It is unknown if Djokovic made an application before that date. However, Tennis Australian and the Victorian government approved his exemption to play in the Australian Open on Dec. 30.
The exemption noted that he had tested positive for COVID-19 on Dec. 16 but had not had a fever or other symptoms in the preceding 72 hours.
However, photos on social media have shown the player attending a children’s award ceremony on Dec. 17, a day after his COVID-19 positive test.
“That’s purely a matter before the courts at the moment,” he said at a press conference in Canberra during the federal hearing.
However, he also referred to Greg Hunt’s letter addressed to Craig Tiley dated on Nov. 29, saying the federal government’s advice to Tennis Australia has been very clear.
“But in relation to the government, our government, the federal government’s advice to Tennis Australia, that was set out very clearly in November.”