Charges Dismissed Against Convoy Protester as Judge Rules Rights Were Violated

Charges Dismissed Against Convoy Protester as Judge Rules Rights Were Violated
Police confront participants of the Freedom Convoy protest after the Emergencies Act was invoked, on Feb. 19, 2022. Scott Olson/Getty Images
Noé Chartier
Updated:
0:00

An Ontario judge has dismissed charges against a Freedom Convoy protester, ruling that the man’s arrest was unlawful, and excluding video evidence collected without the proper authority.

Benjamin Spicer, arrested during the police clearing operation of the protest in Ottawa on Feb. 19, 2022, was charged with mischief, obstructing justice, and being in possession of a knife and pepper spray.

Spicer pleaded not guilty to the charges and alleged various breaches of his charter rights surrounding his arrest and processing.

In a decision rendered on Aug. 2, Justice Timothy Lipson ruled the arrest of Spicer was unlawful, breaching his section 9 charter right against arbitrary detention. This made the resulting search of Spicer unlawful as well, said Lipson.

“There is no evidence that Mr. Spicer did anything in violation of any law that warranted him being detained on the ground and being subjected to physical force,” wrote the judge.

Spicer had been arrested while crowd control police were pushing back protesters at the intersection of Bank and Sparks streets. A constable who handled Spicer after he was grabbed by front-line officers testified he “did not have any knowledge of whether Mr. Spicer committed any crime,” according to the decision.

Police action against protesters had started that weekend, a few days after the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act on Feb. 14. The trucker-led protest against COVID-19 mandates and restrictions had settled in Ottawa in late January.

After Spicer was arrested, he was put in a police transport van in which a surveillance system recorded audio and video of a conversation between Spicer and another protester.

The Crown sought to have that evidence admitted in court and said it inferred criminal activity. It also argued there is no expectation of privacy when in police custody. Justice Lipson, however, ruled the evidence constituted an intercept not obtained lawfully. Intercepts require prior judicial authorization under Part VI of the Criminal Code.

Lipson also ruled Spicer had not been granted the opportunity to speak with a lawyer for a period of over two hours after his arrest, constituting a breach of a charter right to obtain counsel without delay.

“I have found that there were multiple breaches of Mr. Spicer’s Charter rights, and each breach is, in my view, serious,” wrote Lipson.

“I am very satisfied that the judge recognized serious breaches of Mr. Spicer’s section 8, 9, and 10(b) Charter rights, and excluded the evidence after conducting an analysis, effectively gutting the Crown’s case,” Spicer’s lawyer Monick Grenier said in a statement.

Spicer’s defence was being supported by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, a civil rights advocacy group involved in multiple legal challenges related to COVID-19 restrictions and the Freedom Convoy protest.

The Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General did not provide a comment to The Epoch Times on the case.

Protest organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber are currently in Ottawa for the last leg of their trial as they face charges of mischief, intimidation, and counselling others to break the law. Barber has also been charged with counselling others to disobey a court order. The Justice Centre is helping to fund Barber’s defence.
Editor’s note: A previous version of this article said the Crown had dropped the charges against Benjamin Spicer. In fact, the charges were dismissed. The article was updated after receiving a response from the Ministry of the Attorney General. The Epoch Times regrets the error.
Noé Chartier
Noé Chartier
Author
Noé Chartier is a senior reporter with the Canadian edition of The Epoch Times. Twitter: @NChartierET
twitter