Radical social media influencers pushed false claims that Hindu nationalist groups were behind attacks in Leicester, sparking a backlash against the Hindu community, a report has claimed.
Groups of men from the Hindu and Muslim communities, mostly masked or hooded, were seen in tense confrontations and stand-offs on the city’s streets.
This then extended to Birmingham, including vandalism of property, assaults, stabbings, and attacks on places of worship leading to numerous arrests, voluntary interviews, and charges. There have been 55 arrests or voluntary police interviews.
Micro-Community Cohesion Issue
But in the immediate aftermath of the protests, mainstream media outlets falsely put early emphasis on Hindutva, or Hindu nationalism, organised extremism in the UK despite there being no evidence for such groups.Report author and Henry Jackson Society research fellow Charlotte Littlewood told The Epoch Times that large think tanks, the press, and professional academics went on “a wild goose chase” to look for organised Hindutva extremism and Hindu nationalist organisation Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) terrorists “only to find that there was a false narrative.”
“Instead it should have been asked from the outset, who was making these claims and what is their agenda?” she said.
Littlewood said that false information was shared on social media platforms to spread rumours about the activities of Hindutva even though evidence of a Hindu nationalist presence in the UK is tenuous.
All three claims were rebutted by Leicester police.
Social Media Influencers
Some media influencers have a large following.Preacher Mohammed Hijab has 600,000 subscribers on YouTube, 148,000 on Instagram, and 81,000 on Twitter.
Hijab also threatened to return should the Hindutva ever come out again.
On Sept. 9 Freeman posted a claim that a 17-year-old was grabbed by the neck by two Hindu men, but police responded in the thread that they were not aware of this incident.
Echo Chamber
“I was able to watch on a granular level how they acted, who they were tweeting to, what kind of language they were using, and what kind of tools they were using,” she said.Among the wave of social media activity, one of the key rumours was that the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party was funding a bus of Hindutva from Birmingham to Leicester.
“They do the same thing every time. They work in an echo chamber and seek out causes that interest them,” said Littlewood.
“They always get themselves in front of the camera, and they always try and find some political leverage, often labelling their detractors as racists in a bid to control the narrative,” said Littlewood.
The report states that the successful spread of these claims led to a security threat posed to the Hindu community and attacks on their places of worship.
It suggests that broadcasters should perform greater due diligence on those brought in to provide expert commentary.
It also adds that those who have links or have expressed sympathy for extremist organisations should not be given a platform to provide their narrative.
Freeman and Hijab did not respond to requests for comment.
Hijab told the publication that there is a “clear agenda against me... and the Muslim community at large.” He added that the claims against him were unsubstantiated.
Freeman denied the claims, stating: “This is an agenda-driven piece of propaganda. The aim here is clear, to further demonise Muslims, while providing a bill of health to the Hindutva ideology that has driven the violence in Leicester.”