The commissioner presiding over the public inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act has filed court documents suggesting Ontario Premier Doug Ford has overstated the extent of the privilege he has as a politician in order to avoid testifying.
Justice Paul Rouleau, the commissioner tasked with making recommendations regarding the federal government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act, filed court documents Oct. 31 in response to Ford’s reluctance to be a witness at the inquiry.
Rouleau wrote in the court documents that “there is no blanket privilege to decline to testify.”
“Being required to testify before a commission of inquiry does not constitute irreparable harm,” Rouleau said. He said it has “never been established” that parliamentary privilege can be used at an inquiry and that he is “legally entitled” to evidence under its parliamentary mandate, even from a premier.
After refusing to cooperate voluntarily for weeks, Ontario Premier Doug Ford was issued a summons to testify before Rouleau as part of the mandatory public hearing required whenever the Emergencies Act is invoked.
‘Irreparable Harm’
Ford was one of the few premiers who expressed support for Trudeau’s decision to use the extraordinary powers granted by the Emergencies Act. Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island were not in agreement.Ford used Ontario’s emergency law on Feb. 11, even before the federal government invoked the Emergencies Act to quell the Freedom Convoy protests.
The inquiry has heard testimony that the Ontario provincial government refused to meet with the Ottawa mayor and the federal government.
The commissioner said multiple individuals testifying have mentioned Ford and Jones and their “participation or lack thereof in the events leading up to the declaration of emergency” and said he has questions about this.