The Global Times, a Chinese regime mouthpiece, claimed in an article that this softer language towards Beijing signalled that Australia’s “wishful thinking” to “rally” New Zealand against China had stalled.
Ardern said in her speech to the Lowy Institute on July 7 that despite the increasing assertiveness of Beijing, there were “still shared interests on which we can and should cooperate.”
The prime minister also argued that many countries, including China, had played a role in the Pacific region for many years.
“It would be wrong to characterise this engagement, including that of China, as new,” she said. “It would also be wrong to position the Pacific in such a way that they have to ‘pick sides.’”
“These are democratic nations with their own sovereign right to determine their foreign policy engagements. We can be country neutral in approach but have a Pacific bias on the values we apply for these engagements.”
The Chinese media seized these comments, claiming they “exposed the illusion” that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was a newcomer to the Pacific.
New Zealand’s Position
The New Zealand government had appeared to become increasingly firm against the Chinese regime.Later, during the NATO summit in Madrid in June, Ardern said the CCP, in recent times, had become “more assertive and more willing to challenge international rules and norms.”
“We must respond to the actions we see,” she said.
However, earlier in April, Ardern had said she stood by her government’s relationship with the CCP, saying there was still a need to “work together” in areas of mutual interest, despite its “growing assertiveness” in the region.
“Where there are areas we can work together, we will—but there will always be areas in which we will not necessarily agree, and when those areas arise, we are very forthright and clear on our position.”
The small island nation’s economy is reliant on its biggest trading partner, China, and the government has usually strayed from taking a strong stance against the Chinese regime.