Sir Patrick Vallance has told a committee that “we should not aim to frighten people” into changing behaviour over climate change.
Fear Not Necessary for Climate
“It’s important that the messaging [on climate change] isn’t designed to cause fear or upset,“ said Vallance. ”It should be about making sure people understand what the situation is.”Vallance said that he didn’t think replicating the (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) SAGE Model, which helped to craft COVID-19 policies, and the SPI-B (Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour) model was necessary for this kind of issue.
‘Individuals Need to Know What Is Expected’
In terms of net-zero, nudge techniques ie to “nudge” people into making better decisions are already embedded in UK media and government.Last year, the broadcaster Sky commissioned a report from the Behavioural Insights Team, established in the Cabinet Office in 2010 by former Prime Minister David Cameron’s government, to apply behavioural science to public policy on “nudging viewers to decarbonise their lifestyles.”
The secret unit’s existence was revealed in a report from the National Audit Office at the time.
Vallance said that looking ahead “we should not aim to frighten people because that’s not helpful, but we should aim to enable people to understand what actions they can take.”
“I’m eating less meat, I cycle to work, and I fly less than I used to,“ he said. ”I haven’t said I stopped flying or I don’t eat meat—I do. I think it’s about reduction and appropriate reduction across society.”
“Individuals need to know what is expected of them, as well as making that easy for them,” he added.
‘No Such Peer-Reviewed Science’
However, life peer and former Margaret Thatcher cabinet minister Lord Peter Lilley asked, “is it the job of scientists to tell the truth when it is alarming but to keep quiet when it’s not?”“I put down a question asking the government whether they knew of any peer-reviewed science that suggested that the human race would be rendered extinct in the next couple of centuries if we did nothing, and they said no, we have no such peer-reviewed science,” he said.
“Absolutely not. The job is to try and make the data and the evidence as clear as you can,” replied Vallance. “Science is not an immutable set of facts, it is an assessment of the current state of knowledge,” he added.