The federal government must find a balance between its attempt to regulate foreign digital giants and public concerns of over-surveillance of the freedom of speech on the internet, a House of Commons committee heard this week.
Levelling the Playing Field
Local journalism has been on the decline for quite some time, but it has gotten much worse in the past year due the impact of the pandemic, Ryan McAdams, group publisher for the Alberta Newspaper Group, told the committee. He said the disappearance of local radio stations and newspapers has led to the decline of “fact-based communications reporting.”“We sit in a shifting media landscape, where the narrowing of the function of local news production has been eroded by … advertising dollars,” McAdams said. “What the federal government used to spend on newspapers, TV, and radio stations is now largely spent on digital and media campaigns that are internet-based.”
McAdams said since the internet giants are mostly based in the United States, the tax dollars that Canada puts into those companies are leaving the country rather than being reinvested to produce Canadian content or employ local workers.
Another concern is that traditional broadcasters and digital giants are not on a level playing field, said John Petrie, a retired broadcaster. Traditional broadcasters are tied up by many rules while internet-based radios have few regulations.
“Traditional radio has to follow certain rules such as playing 35 percent Canadian content, follow the Canadian Broadcast Standards, playing the music they are licensed to play,” Petrie testified.
Individual Rights, Personal Privacy
Free speech advocates have raised concerns that the proposed legislation to regulate social media would undermine individual rights and personal privacy.“Governments like to think they are the arbiters of regulations and rules, but we saw in the U.S. election, big companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube were making up the rules deciding on what content could be shared," Petrie said.
“The question is, do we need controls or do we let people decide themselves on what people want to hear and listen to?”
Chan noted that “there are 35,000 people that work on content moderation on Facebook,” although he said he was unable to provide the committee with the exact number of content moderators based in Canada.
“Facebook’s community standards actually set out rules of engagement on our platform. They deal with bullying and harassment, they deal with disrespectful conducts, and we set out very clearly what is and isn’t allowed on the platform,” Facebook Canada’s policy manager Rachel Curran said during the hearing.
Facebook Canada said it welcomes more regulations and looks forward to working with the federal government on “drawing the right line” between moderating harmful content and avoiding “over-regulating people.”
Petrie pointed to data collection as a major privacy concern.
“Who owns that data, who owns the information about me? I think we kind of have to look at that as a nation, because right now … Google or Facebook own that data, which is important for their advertisers,” he said.
“In the end, the question is: What do Canadians want from the media? They want to be informed, they want to be entertained, and they want the freedom to choose where they get their information and entertainment from.”
