A B.C. nurse has filed a human rights complaint against the B.C. nurses’ college after she lost a disciplinary hearing over comments she made about gender issues.
On March 21, Hamm said she has filed a human rights complaint against the college.
Hamm attached a photo of a letter from the BC Human Rights Tribunal.
The letter says the tribunal is reviewing the complaint to see if it “contains an allegation of discrimination prohibited by the BC Human Rights Code.”
Hamm’s Response
Hamm said in a statement to The Epoch Times on March 14 that she was shocked by the panel’s ruling.She said she was in disbelief that “speaking the truth” resulted in her being found guilty of “discriminatory and derogatory speech.”
Hamm said that “no woman should be punished for standing up for our rights.”
Following the decision, the college said it considered the ruling to “be an important statement against discrimination.”
Hamm drew attention when she sponsored a billboard that read ‘I [love] JK Rowling” in 2020. It referred to the UK author’s public advocacy for female-only spaces, like prisons, restrooms, and sporting events.
The billboard resulted in two complaints against Hamm to the college, with one saying she was “transphobic” and not fit to be a nurse, according to the March 13 decision.
The matter was referred to the BCCNM’s inquiry committee for investigation. The result was a report on Hamm’s social media posts and other online activity.
Panel Decision
In its decision, the panel said the “unprofessional conduct” occurred in relation to four cases where Hamm identified herself as a nurse while making “discriminatory and/or derogatory” comments. This included describing herself as a nurse in the biography attached to three articles she had written, and in one podcast, the panel said.The panel said she made statements that were “untruthful and unfair” and that Hamm challenged “the existence of transgender women.”
BCCNM’s panel also said Hamm’s comments were “designed, in part, to elicit fear, contempt and outrage against members of the transgender community.”
The panel said not all of Hamm’s comments that were the subject of the hearing were found to be unprofessional. The decision notes that Hamm’s comments about there being only two sexes was not discriminatory, but it said statements that a man cannot become a woman were discriminatory.
She notes in the column that the panel said in its decision that it “understands that the statement that there are only two sexes — male and female — is an oversimplification that does not align with current medical or biological understanding.”
Hamm also noted the panel said it agreed that “it is discriminatory and derogatory to suggest that transgender women should not be in the same spaces as cisgender women.”
“It means that the panel believes that to advocate for the protection of women’s spaces — as is our Charter-protected right — is wrong, improper, and discriminatory for any regulated professional to do,” she wrote in the piece.
Hamm also has the option of appealing the decision to the British Columbia Supreme Court.
J.K. Rowling reacted to the news of Hamm’s discipline by saying she stood by the Canadian nurse.