His ruling came on the second day of a legal challenge by the City of Surrey against the B.C. Public Safety minister’s order to continue a transition from the RCMP to the municipal Surrey Police Service.
Lawyers for the ministry told Mr. Loo Monday that an affidavit filed by Surrey Police Union president Rick Stewart contains a “long list of bullying and harassment incidents” that if made public could cause “undue public concern about the state of affairs at the Surrey RCMP detachment.”
Mr. Stewart’s affidavit says union members claim “the Surrey RCMP detachment is toxic and hostile, and that they have been subject to bullying, discrimination, harassment, and intimidation.”
The affidavit refers to several attached “exhibits” that contain specific details of the Surrey Police Service members’ complaints.
The ministry’s lawyers sought to keep those details sealed, but the exhibits were not immediately available from the B.C. Supreme Court registry Tuesday.
Surrey RCMP spokesman Staff Sgt. Kris Clark said in a statement that the “RCMP is committed to providing a healthy, safe and respectful work place for all employees, free of harassment and discrimination.”
The statement said the Mounties are not a party in the court case and don’t have a copy of the affidavit in question. “Surrey RCMP and SPS officers have worked together in the detachment for over two years and have done so with professionalism,” Mr. Clark said.
In a separate dispute, Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke has filed a complaint to B.C.’s Police Complaints Commissioner alleging numerous Surrey Police Service officers withdrew their services in order to meet with their chief and Solicitor General Mike Farnworth, something the Surrey Police Board has denied.
Ms. Locke says in a letter obtained by Global News that the meeting happened last Wednesday at about 3 p.m. and that the incident has “huge implications for public safety.”
The Surrey Police Board issued a statement in response saying it can confirm that a number of officers did attend the meeting with its chief and the solicitor general at its training centre.
However, the officers who were on shift were never ordered to attend nor withdrawn from service, the statement says, and on-duty officers had radios with them and were available for calls.
“Over the course of this policing transition, there have been a number of times when officers with SPS and the RCMP have needed to meet with their leadership team or their union to be briefed on significant developments,” the statement says.
The board says to “suggest that our officers would jeopardize the safety of Surrey residents to attend a meeting is not only disrespectful but hurtful.”
Deputy Police Complaint Commissioner Andrea Spindler said the office was aware of media reports about Locke’s complaint, but they have yet to receive a copy as of late Tuesday.
“We’re working to determine what the details of this complaint are so we can assess next steps,” Ms. Spindler said.
Ms. Spindler said complaints involving “service or policy” matters such as staffing or resource allocation by municipal police departments are assessed by the office and then referred to police boards, which are then “responsible for determining next steps to address the complaint.”
